Andrew agreesto a verbal contract with Mavis Tools to investigate their operating systems and recommendations as to how to improve them. Andrew expects to help implement the changes the company accepts. Andrew makes it clear that he cannot give Mavis Tools a definite timetable, but it is clear that the whole process will take longer than a year. Part of their agreement is that either party may terminate the contract on 60 days' written notice to the other if the work is progressing unsatisfactorily. In this situation,

a. since the contract is for an indefinite period, it falls under the Statute of Frauds and is not enforceable.

b. if this contract is not completed within a year, it will fall under the Statute of Frauds and will become unenforceable at that point.

c. since this contract cannot be performed within the period of one year from the date it was made, it falls under the Statute of Frauds and is not enforceable.

d. since this is a contract for services, it is not covered by the Statute of Frauds and is enforceable.

e. since this contract could be terminated within one year of being made, it does not fall under the Statute of Frauds even if it is not terminated within the year and is enforceable.