Annotations Project PromptOverview For this assignment, you'll be analyzing a variety of academic and non academic sources that pertain to your next research projects for class Think of this project as a source guide that you create for yourself (you are your audience and you are in charge of guiding this project) The goal is for you to create, organize, and develop a sort of map for yourself as you begin to write up the results of your research Annotating and organizing your secondary sources in this project will help you strategically build your claims and argument for the Multimodal Research Project, which comes next This is also a chance for you to practice your rhetorical critical thinking skills you learned about source assessment and determining the credibility of sources To begin this project, you must start finding and refining your list of secondary resources that you will annotate for your research projects (remember, each project is on the same research subject topic you chose in the proposal, so you can use any preliminary resources you found for the Research Proposal) Please view the instructional materials this week before beginning this process, as much of that material is geared toward getting you started Once you're confident in your source list, you'll then create an introduction to your project to overview the different areas of research you pulled from When that is done, you can begin each annotation (6 minimum) that will include your pointed summary, author's note, and rhetorical analysis about each source As you read more sources and gain a stronger understanding of your topic, you'll be able to draw connections across multiple perspectives Doing so will help you formulate strong arguments and claims for your research goals Here are some samples of similar projects from the Purdue Owl Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to start building up your list of credible resources for your Multimodal Research Project (and by extension, the Public Writing Project ) This document, if done well, will significantly cut back on your time writing for the next projects The art of note taking can save you time and cognitive labor later on in your writing process If you work toward having a solid basis now, you won't be scrambling to research and write at the same time when we near the end of the semester This project also encourages you to write some of your preliminary analysis so you can use it in the writing you compose the subsequent two class projects The goal here is for you to create a research guide for yourself, and it is meant for you to have a space to start drawing some connections to see patterns across your sources When you find those connections, point them out and write about them explicitly this will be the heart of future class projects Required Elements Before you jump into your entries, you must have 2 3 paragraph introduction that discusses the types of sources (academic, news, government, etc) you're using for the project, what patterns you see across the sources, and what fields of study you're drawing from (aviation, health sciences, journalism, etc) and why doing so enriches your project You must include 6 sources You'll want to include a variety of resources, ranging from books, peer reviewed articles, news articles, popular sources, or multimedia sources I won't dictate a number of each type of source you need to have because your projects all have different requirements focus on different disciplines However, you should not annotate only one type of sources (e g don't exclusively use news sources) Aiming for one of each different type is a good start All sources must be from legitimate, credible sites If you need help determining whether a website is credible or not, you can always ask me for help, or see this page for information of evaluating digital sources, or this page for general information on evaluating sources Each annotation should contain at least 2 3 paragraphs Each paragraph must include For the summary portion of the annotation, you should offer a brief synopsis of the piece's argument, author's credentials, author's methods (e g, survey, interview, who research participants are, etc), and key pieces of evidence the author writes right at the start of each annotation (2 3 sentences) For the author's note, you should discuss the value of the piece to your research efforts Write about how the source better helps you understand the issues you are researching, how you might build on this work, how it has challenged you to change your thinking or research question, or what sources you now want to collect after reading it (2 3 sentences) Last, for the rhetorical analysis component, include analysis on how the author uses ethos, pathos, and logos (2 3 sentences) Projects should be formatted in APA or MLA Refer to the Purdue OWL for citation directions Logistics 1)6 sources Documents should be double spaced, in 12pt font) this assignment does not have a minimum word count, as long as it is written in complete sentences, 6 sources are analyzed, and all of the required information is included for each source 2) Assignments must be properly formatted in an Annotated Bibliography form (either MLA or APA), based on the Purdue OWL guidelines, found here Please creat two annotations to submit for review this week These annotations and revisions will be the model you should follow for the rest of the annotations after you complete the full Eli Review Cycle this week Here are some samples of annotations if you'd like to check them out Remember these are meant to be a quick reference guide for yourself to easily navigate the most important information from your secondary resources as you put together your larger research projects Each entry should contain at least 1 5 2 paragraphs of writing, but no more than 3 For the summary portion of the annotation, you should offer a brief synopsis of the piece's argument, author's credentials, author's methods (e g, survey, interview, who research participants are, etc), and key pieces of evidence the author writes right at the start of each annotation (2 3 sentences) For the author's note, you should discuss the value of the piece to your research efforts Write about how the source better helps you understand the issues you are researching, how you might build on this work, how it has challenged you to change your thinking or research question, or what sources you now want to collect after reading it (1 2 sentences) Last, for the rhetorical analysis component, include analysis on how the author uses ethos, pathos, and logos (2 3 sentences) Projects should be formatted in APA or MLA Refer to the Purdue OWL for citation directions YOUR THINGS WOULD COME FROM THIS TOPIC 2 Investigating the dietary habits of college students and the relationship between diet and mental health College students often struggle to make healthy food choices due to their busy lives and limited budgets This research topic would explore the dietary habits of college students, with a particular focus on their mental health Data would be gathered from surveys and interviews with college students to better understand their dietary habits and mental health The research could also include an analysis of the students' eating habits and the correlations between their diets and mental health

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on May 18, 2024

Annotations Project PromptOverview For this assignment, you'll be analyzing a variety of academic and non-academic sources that pertain to your next research projects for class.

Annotations Project PromptOverview

For this assignment, you'll be analyzing a variety of academic and non-academic sources that pertain to your next research projects for class. Think of this project as a source guide that you create for yourself (you are your audience and you are in charge of guiding this project). The goal is for you to create, organize, and develop a sort of map for yourself as you begin to write up the results of your research. Annotating and organizing your secondary sources in this project will help you strategically build your claims and argument for the Multimodal Research Project, which comes next. This is also a chance for you to practice your rhetorical critical thinking skills you learned about source assessment and determining the credibility of sources.

To begin this project, you must start finding and refining your list of secondary resources that you will annotate for your research projects (remember, each project is on the same research subject/topic you chose in the proposal, so you can use any preliminary resources you found for the Research Proposal). Please view the instructional materials this week before beginning this process, as much of that material is geared toward getting you started.

Once you're confident in your source list, you'll then create an introduction to your project to overview the different areas of research you pulled from. When that is done, you can begin each annotation (6 minimum) that will include: your pointed summary, author's note, and rhetorical analysis about each source. As you read more sources and gain a stronger understanding of your topic, you'll be able to draw connections across multiple perspectives. Doing so will help you formulate strong arguments and claims for your research goals. Here are some samples of similar projects from the Purdue Owl.

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to start building up your list of credible resources for your Multimodal Research Project (and by extension, the Public Writing Project.) This document, if done well, will significantly cut back on your time writing for the next projects. The art of note-taking can save you time and cognitive labor later on in your writing process. If you work toward having a solid basis now, you won't be scrambling to research and write at the same time when we near the end of the semester. This project also encourages you to write some of your preliminary analysis so you can use it in the writing you compose the subsequent two class projects. The goal here is for you to create a research guide for yourself, and it is meant for you to have a space to start drawing some connections to see patterns across your sources. When you find those connections, point them out and write about them explicitly; this will be the heart of future class projects!

Required Elements

Before you jump into your entries, you must have 2-3 paragraph introduction that discusses the types of sources (academic, news, government, etc) you're using for the project, what patterns you see across the sources, and what fields of study you're drawing from (aviation, health sciences, journalism, etc) and why doing so enriches your project.
You must include 6 sources. You'll want to include a variety of resources, ranging from books, peer-reviewed articles, news articles, popular sources, or multimedia sources. I won't dictate a number of each type of source you need to have because your projects all have different requirements/focus on different disciplines. However, you should not annotate only one type of sources (e.g. don't exclusively use news sources). Aiming for one of each different type is a good start.All sources must be from legitimate, credible sites. If you need help determining whether a website is credible or not, you can always ask me for help, or see this page for information of evaluating digital sources, or this page for general information on evaluating sources.
Each annotation should contain at least 2-3 paragraphs. Each paragraph must include:
For the summary portion of the annotation, you should offer a brief synopsis of the piece's argument, author's credentials, author's methods (e.g, survey, interview, who research participants are, etc), and key pieces of evidence the author writes right at the start of each annotation. (2-3 sentences)
For the author's note, you should discuss the value of the piece to your research efforts. Write about how the source better helps you understand the issues you are researching, how you might build on this work, how it has challenged you to change your thinking or research question, or what sources you now want to collect after reading it. (2-3 sentences)
Last, for the rhetorical analysis component, include analysis on how the author uses ethos, pathos, and logos (2-3 sentences)
Projects should be formatted in APA or MLA. Refer to the Purdue OWL for citation directions.

Logistics

1)6 sources. Documents should be double spaced, in 12pt font); this assignment does not have a minimum word count, as long as it is written in complete sentences, 6 sources are analyzed, and all of the required information is included for each source.

2) Assignments must be properly formatted in an Annotated Bibliography form (either MLA or APA), based on the Purdue OWL guidelines, found here.

Please creat two annotations to submit for review this week. These annotations and revisions will be the model you should follow for the rest of the annotations after you complete the full Eli Review Cycle this week. Here are some samples of annotations if you'd like to check them out. Remember:these are meant to be a quick reference/guide for yourself to easily navigate the most important information from your secondary resources as you put together your larger research projects.

Each entry should contain at least 1.5-2 paragraphs of writing, but no more than 3.
For the summary portion of the annotation, you should offer a brief synopsis of the piece's argument, author's credentials, author's methods (e.g, survey, interview, who research participants are, etc), and key pieces of evidence the author writes right at the start of each annotation. (2-3 sentences)
For the author's note, you should discuss the value of the piece to your research efforts. Write about how the source better helps you understand the issues you are researching, how you might build on this work, how it has challenged you to change your thinking or research question, or what sources you now want to collect after reading it. (1-2 sentences)
Last, for the rhetorical analysis component, include analysis on how the author uses ethos, pathos, and logos (2-3 sentences)
Projects should be formatted in APA or MLA. Refer to the Purdue OWL for citation directions.

YOUR THINGS WOULD COME FROM THIS TOPIC

2. Investigating the dietary habits of college students and the relationship between diet and mental health: College students often struggle to make healthy food choices due to their busy lives and limited budgets. This research topic would explore the dietary habits of college students, with a particular focus on their mental health. Data would be gathered from surveys and interviews with college students to better understand their dietary habits and mental health. The research could also include an analysis of the students' eating habits and the correlations between their diets and mental health.