Answer all following the questions:

True or false

A person who is intoxicated when he or she signs a contract can void the contract only if his or her intoxication was involuntary. In most cases, a dog catcher would not qualify for a reward for a lost dog because the offeror has a contract defense that there was no consideration of the unilateral offer. A person seeking to void a contract based on intoxication must show that he or she was so intoxicated as to fail to comprehend the legal consequences of entering into the contract. Implied-in-fact contracts differ from express contracts in that the conduct of the parties, rather than their words, reveal that they intended to form a contract that creates and defines the terms of the contract