Answer each question by identifying the correct issue, the rule, analysis, and conclusion (i.e. Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion).

Dormant Commerce Clause. After the eviction lawsuit, Stone and June, left the landlord business and moved to Nevada. They opened a store called "Tattle Toys" with a commitment to manufacture all its children toys and products in the US. They wanted to position "Tattle Toys" as the premier "Made in the US" brand. After a few years of opening, things started to look grim for Stone and June. It all started when independent research revealed that a few of Tattle Toys products were dangerously defective or contained high level of toxins. No one seemed to be bothered by this finding except for consumers in Colorado. Consumers in that state flooded their legislators' offices with demands to restrict the interstate shipments of Tattle Toys products to Colorado due to concerns over their safety and quality. During this legislative session, the state of Colorado, pursuant to its police powers, passed a law that prohibited all baby and children products made by Tattle Toys to enter its borders. Tattle-Toys sued Colorado, alleging that the law imposes an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce. Colorado argued that the law was valid because it had the right to protect its residents from harm. Did the Colorado law violate the dormant Commerce Clause by imposing unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce?