Answer & Explanation

In my capacity as an architect,

I would like to operate under descriptive specifications and proprietary specifications since, with these techniques, our primary purpose is to supply and utilize thorough details of materials, craftsmanship, and processes that the contractors must follow in order to assure top quality. These specifications are preferable to me since they are industry standard. For safety and quality reasons, we must guarantee that all work is actually achievable, and that each item is appropriately classified.

Step$-$by$-$step explanation

As a contractor,

I would also love to work under detailed specifications as well as proprietary requirements since I feel that this is the most effective method to ensure that everything in the project is completed properly. Both specifications can be simply passed along and are basic enough that subcontractors may come in and grasp them. As a contractor, you must be quick, efficient, and able to follow instructions in order to do the project correctly the first time.

There are a variety of things that influence your choices and your justifications.

Whether you want to call me old$-$fashioned or not, at the end of the day, it all comes down to safety for me$.$ I have discovered that although utilizing these strategies may not result in cost savings, they may ensure that all work is completed according to plan and in a timely way, while minimizing disagreements. Furthermore, they may be tracked down and referenced for future additions or potential damages.