Answer need to be in IRAC format

Cleveland Chiropractic College CCC promised prospective students that CCC would provide clinical training and experience A critical part of a chiropractic education and a requirement for graduation and obtaining a license to practice. Specifically, CCC expressly promised to provide sufficient patients as evidenced by its report to the council on Chiropractic Education, an accreditation body though which chiropractic colleges monitor and certify themselves. In that report CCC said that patient recruitment was the "joint responsibility" of the college and the student. During the 1990's most of the "patients" that students saw were healthy persons whom the students recruitedto be stand=in patients.

After graduating and obtaining licenses to practice, Michael Troknya and nineteen others filed a suit in a federal district court against CCC alleging amoung other things, negligent misrepresentation. What are the elements of this cause of action? Are they satisfied in this case? Why or why not. Troknya v Cleveland Chiropractic Clinic, 280 F 3d 1200 (8th Cir 2002)