answer prompts in detail please 1.McNeil, a division of Johnson & Johnson, had significant problems with quality control on its products, including infant Tylenol and Motrin. Worn equipment in plants resulted in metal flakes in some of the company's products. The result was federal sanctions and a series of lawsuits by users of the products. The shareholders brought suit against the directors for their failure to supervise the company's activities and facilities. Can the shareholders sue the directors for these reasons? Who recovers if they can sue? What theories would the shareholders use? [Monk v Johnson & Johnson, 2011 WL 6339824 (D. N.J. 2011)]

2. The Orleans Parish School Board hired Johnson & Higgins (J & H) to provide consulting services. J & H provided those services over the next few years but was then acquired by Marsh & McLennan, a larger insurance firm. Marsh continued the work that J & H had been doing and submitted an invoice to the Orleans Parish School Board for reimbursement. The Board said that it had no contractual arrangement with Marsh and, as such, was not liable for the services. Is the Board correct? Describe what happened in the relationships and apply the principles of corporate law to determine whether Marsh can be paid. [Marsh Advantage America v Orleans School Board, 995 So. 2d (La. App. 2008)]