Answer the following questions.

Question 1.

John Petosa a simple Professor of Practice at SyracuseUniversity has a life long dream of owning a winery. He has studied the soils and topography of both New YorkState and California. It is obvious that California wine and grapes are superior to those of New York; however, there are certain grapes that are able to be grown in New York such as Riesling and Marquette that do well and have reached world acclaim. The cost of land in California is significantly higher in grape growing regions because of the success of other vintners and as such, John has chosen to purchase a 50 acre plot of land in the Seneca Lake region of the Finger Lakes in New York. The soil is very conducive to growing grapes according to a study performed by Cornell’s agriculture management group. The 50 acre purchase has taken most of John’s available cash and so he may need to take on a partner in this venture down the road. Further, he is always open to bringing on other partners in the venture who can bring expertise that John doesn’t have. John wants to start his business on the right footing and has come to your offices for advice on what type of entity he should form for his new business or businesses. Discuss in depth, the types of entities that John could form, the advantages and disadvantages of each with particular emphasis on the tax considerations and which one or ones you would recommend. Of course specific emphasis should be placed on the new Tax laws enacted and the impact on the overall decision. Further, support your conclusion considering the various inherent risk factors associated with this activity.

Question 2

Building on question 1, fast forward 25 years. John has created an incredibly successful wine operation in the Northeast. He has vineyard lands along the Seneca and Cayuga wine trails in the Finger Lakes of New York. Many of his wineries are considered some of the best on the East Coast, and one of them, “Jennifer T” was recently named winery of the year by Wine Spectator magazine . In all, there are 5 different wineries operations each in a different corporation. All 5 are in a separate S-Corporation with all the stock owned by the parent Company Petosa Vineyards Inc, also an S-Corporation. John and his wife Jennifer own 75% of the stock of the parent Company which means they own 75% of all of the value of the entities. Jennifer and John are each other’s second marriage. John has three children from his prior marriage and Jennifer has 2 children from her previous marriage. John and Jennifer’s family have been an important part of the Company’s growth. John’s brother, Tom became a partner in the business providing much needed capital when the wineries were in a growth stage. Tom owns 20% of the remaining stock and he has 2 children who work at the winery on weekends doing wine tasting, but have other jobs during the week. Jennifer’s sister Karen owns the remaining 5% of the outstanding shares. Karen has 3 children, none of which are involved in the wine operations. However, Karen has one son, Stephen, who has an engineering degree from Georgia Tech and has been helpful in development of the winery’s bio-dynamic farming operations. Stephen has expressed an interest in becoming a bigger part of the overall operations as he enjoys the laid back lifestyle the winery offers. Jennifer has been the driving force behind the winery’s commitment to bio-dynamic, organic farming. She has been in charge of the vineyard operations and overall marketing. Jennifer’s two sons have also been very involved in the winery operations. Albert received his degree from Syracuse University in Economics and Entrepreneurship. After a few summers working as a landscaper, he learned that he loved to work the land and has been the one to implement his mother’s organic farming techniques at the various vineyards. Nino graduated from SyracuseUniversity with a degree in information studies. He has been in charge of the information systems for the wineries. He has also been responsible for the social media and other electronic marketing methods that have catapulted the growth in the company’s exports to other states and overseas markets. Only Christopher, of John’s three children has been involved in the wineries. Chris, a graduate of SU’s Whitman School of Management with a degree in accounting and the Syracuse College of Law, has been the CFO of the Company and the lead wine maker following in his father’s footsteps. It has been Chris’ adept touch and penchant for knowing just when to harvest the grapes that has been crucial to the recent accolades received by various wine rating agencies. Jay and Allyson are John’s other two children and although they come and visit the wineries frequently, they are both medical professionals and have never expressed an interest in being a part of the wine business.

Of course, John has been the visionary leader that we have come to expect in a family business leader. He gave up teaching after Chris graduated from undergraduate school to concentrate on the wine business. His combination of accounting and legal knowledge, as well as his many contacts in the business world has been one of the major reasons for the winery’s success. His greatest contribution however, is that of winemaker. After much trial and error, he has become one of the best wine makers in the world, owning much of his success to his grandfather’s teaching and the assistance of Paul Hobbs, one of the greatest wine makers ever.

All the land is owned by John and Jennifer in separate LLC’s. Each LLC charges the respective S-Corporations rent for the use of the land. The rent charged is usually enough to cover the cost of the real estate taxes, insurance and mortgage on the properties. However, 2 of the LLC’s have loss carryforwards since they just started operations and the business end of the winery could not afford a fair market rent. The LLC’s elected to be treated as partnerships. Jennifer and John have included their children as minority owners of the LLC’s.

Specific requirements based on the information provided in Tables 1, 2 and 3 compute the following:

1. Using the information provided, compute the 2018 tax return for John and Jennifer based on the S corporation and the LLC’s activity. Be sure to show line item detail of the 1040 and any supporting schedules. You may use the actual forms but it is not necessary. John and Jennifer use the standard deduction and have no other income items such as interest, dividends etc. outside of the information provided in the tables.

2. Compute the overall tax effect if the S corporations were C corporations including the revised individual income tax consequence to John and Jennifer. Comment on the effect.

3. Compute the overall tax effect if all the S corporations, and the LLC’s are taxed as C corporations including the revised individual income tax consequence to John and Jennifer. Comment on the effect.

4. Do you recommend any additional entity revisions to lower John and Jennifer’s overall tax consequence in light of the new tax law changes?

5. Returning to the original scenario, if John and Jennifer were interested in funding the $4,000,000 expansion of the Tennity Ice Pavilion to include a lacrosse and baseball field to further the Men’s club hockey, lacrosse and baseball programs in honor of their three sons who were all the captains of their respective teams while attending Syracuse University how would this potentially impact their current or future tax returns and tax liability?

Assume that John and Jennifer use the standard deduction on their personal return, since they live on the winery property and have no separate mortgage or interest expense

Be sure to take advantage of any credits available using the new tax laws and consider all sales from the winery business to qualify as domestic production activity.

Table 1

Petosa Vineyards Inc. 2018
Jennifer T	Jeter Run	Whitman	Wellington	MBA Whine	Totals
Winery	Winery	Winery	Winery
Wine Sales	1,200,000	1,350,000	750,000	900,000	2,500,000	6,700,000
Cost of Sales	570,000	620,000	375,000	425,000	825,000	2,815,000
Gross Profit	630,000	730,000	375,000	475,000	1,675,000	3,885,000
Operating Expenses
Salaries	345,000	350,000	75,500	127,500	625,000	1,523,000
Rent	120,000	120,000	120,000	125,000	250,000	735,000
Repairs and Maintenance	50,000	50,000	50,000	35,000	50,000	235,000
Advertising	100,000	110,000	100,000	110,000	100,000	520,000
Depreciation (Straight Line)	25,000	35,000	35,000	25,000	50,000	170,000
Total Operating Expenses	640,000	665,000	380,500	422,500	1,075,000	3,183,000
Other Gains and Loses
Capital Gain (Loss)	-2,500	5,000	3,100	-12,500	-7,500	-14,400
Charitable Contributions	0	-5,000	-5,000	-10,000	-25,000	-45,000
------------------------	------------------------	------------------------	------------------------	------------------------	------------------------
Net Income	-12,500	65,000	-7,400	30,000	567,500	642,600
=================	=================	=================	=================	=================	=================
All activity qualifies for Qualified Domestic Production Activities Deduction
Gains and losses are all long term

Table 2

Salaries are as follows	Jennifer T	Jeter Run	Whitman	Wellington	MBA Whine	Totals
	Winery	Winery	Winery	Winery
Jennifer	75,000	75,000	10,000	35,000	75,000	270,000
John	75,000	75,000	10,000	35,000	75,000	270,000
Tom	25,000	25,000	0	5,000	25,000	80,000
Karen	5,000	5,000	0	5,000	5,000	20,000
Nino	35,000	35,000	5,000	5,000	35,000	115,000
Chris	35,000	35,000	5,000	5,000	35,000	115,000
Albie	35,000	35,000	5,000	5,000	35,000	115,000
Stephen	25,000	20,000	2,500	2,500	5,000	55,000
Other Staff	35,000	45,000	38,000	30,000	335,000	483,000
345,000	350,000	75,500	127,500	625,000	1,523,000
================	================	================	================	================	================

Table 3

Farms owned in individual LLC's
Nature	Miano	Petosa	CPA	Eight
High LLC	Bluff LLC	Path LLC	Delight LLC	Awards LLC	Totals
Acres	33	22	27	10	55
--------------	--------------	--------------	--------------	--------------	--------------
Rental Income