Question
Answer the below question relating to laws governing business entities Doctor performed surgery on Perry's spine to insert a metal rod designed by Bolton, Inc.
Answer the below question relating to laws governing business entities
Doctor performed surgery on Perry's spine to insert a metal rod designed by Bolton, Inc.
(Bolton). Shortly after the surgery, Perry developed severe back pain at the location
where the rod was inserted. Within the applicable statute of limitations for a tort action
for negligence, Perry sued Doctor in federal district court, alleging that she was
negligent in using Bolton's rod for the kind of back condition from which he suffered.
Personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and venue were proper.
During a deposition, Perry's attorney asked Doctor to state whether she had performed
any other spine surgeries using Bolton's rods and, if so, whether any of those surgeries
had resulted in complications. Doctor's attorney objected to the questions on the
ground that the information requested had nothing to do with whether Doctor was
negligent as to Perry, and Doctor refused to answer. After the attorneys properly met
and conferred concerning Doctor's refusal, Perry's attorney filed a motion to compel
Doctor to answer the questions.
Shortly after the statute of limitations had run, Perry learned through a newspaper
article that Bolton had been sued by several patients who alleged that they suffered
severe back pain after Bolton's rod was inserted into their spines during surgery. Perry
immediately sought and obtained leave to amend his federal complaint to join and
include a claim against Bolton, alleging that it had negligently designed the rod. Bolton
immediately filed a motion to dismiss Perry's claim against it on the ground that the
statute of limitations had already run.
Perry also learned that Doctor had lost a lawsuit brought by another patient with a back
condition like his who had also alleged negligence by Doctor for inserting Bolton's rod
into his spine. Perry filed a motion for summary judgment against Doctor on the basis
of preclusion.
1. How should the court rule on Perry's motion to compel Doctor to answer? Discuss.
Q2
Explain constant return to scale relating to input output relationship in a firm
Q3
Discuss the distinction between return factor and return to scale
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started