answer the following questions about human rights. there is no reading assigned to these questions, rather these are reflection questions. please make sure to fully answer each questions with details to support the answer.

3. Do regional human rights conventions have the capability to complement international human rights law, or do they merely conflict with it, as in the case of the African Charter's usage of clawback clauses?

4. Do any distinct differences stand out when comparing the different regional organizations? What about when compared to global mechanisms?

5. Do you think states are more likely to follow a global or regional human rights framework? Why?

7. Is it better to have a stronger system where countries threaten to leave, such as the Inter-American system, or a weaker system, like the African example, that might have greater participation by all states?