Answer the following questions. Make sure when answering, use direct information from provided sources to defend, confirm, or strengthen your answer.

1. The use of neurocriminology in criminal cases: Read through the following BBC article for more information and case examples where genetic history has been used in an effort to defend clients: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20180530-the-controversial-debut-of-genes-in-criminal-cases How might using genetic evidence like the MAOA gene variant to defend someone in court impact the way we think about personal responsibility and accountability? Is it ethically justified to reduce a criminal sentence based on genetic predispositions? What are the potential risks and benefits of considering such evidence in court?

2. Discussing the link between nutrition and criminal behavior: Read through the following Science Focus article for more information on how changes to prison food impacted inmate violence: https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/prison-food-nutrition-violence-mental-health The article mentions that enhancing prisoners' diet with supplements could be economically viable, with significant potential savings in other costs. Discuss the potential economic benefits and challenges of implementing a more nutritious diet in prisons. How might this investment compare to other forms of intervention aimed at reducing violence? The discussion around prison nutrition often becomes contentious due to differing views on whether the function of prison is rehabilitation or punishment. How do these philosophical perspectives on the role of corrections influence decisions about prison nutrition? How can these conflicts be reconciled?