Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Answer the issue directly. Yes or No. (2) Provide an analysis of the facts against the rule (Statute of Frauds). Your format should follow Conclusion-Rule-Analysis-Conclusion

Answer the issue directly. Yes or No.

(2) Provide an analysis of the facts against the rule (Statute of Frauds). Your format should follow Conclusion-Rule-Analysis-Conclusion format.

Blue Max Inn, Inc. v. Holtzner (Md. App., 2016)

FACTS

Ms. Holtzner was the owner of property located at 11415 Philadelphia Road, White Marsh, Maryland. There are two structures located on the property: her residence and a larger building that has been used as a restaurant. Since approximately 2001, Blue Max has operated a bar and restaurant known as "The Rustic Inn" in the second structure.

In 2008, the then-owner of Blue Max, Michael Bayne, entered into an agreement to sell the stock in the corporation to Neal Rider.

Rider and Holtzner executed a writing (the "2008 Agreement") that stated in its entirety:

October 2008

To Who It May Concern:

I, Rosemary Holtzner, Owner of the premises, 11415 Philadelphia Road, White Marsh, Maryland 21162 will hereby lease the above mentioned property to NEAL RIDER President of Blue Max Inn Inc. trading as the Rustic Inn starting October 2008.

/s/ Rosemary Holtzner

/s/ Neal Rider

It is undisputed that Rider and Holtzner orally agreed to a monthly rent and that the rent was timely paid.

As time passed, Holtzner noticed an increase in the number of motorcycles and what she perceived to be motorcycle gangs frequenting The Rustic Inn. Holtzner voiced her concerns. According to Holtzner, Rider responded by walking into the bar area and bringing back an individual who was a member of a local motorcycle gang or club. Holtzner testified that this individual threatened her.

Shortly thereafter, Holtzner notified Rider that she was cancelling the lease and that he had thirty days to vacate the premises.

Holtzner said that no agreement, oral or otherwise, was ever made regarding the term (duration) of the Lease. Rider disagreed. To support his contention, Rider references an agreement between Rider and A&M Amusements, LLC., dated October 16, 2008. In that agreement, which was also signed by Holtzner, A&M Amusements agreed to lease coin-operated amusement machines to Rider for an initial term of ten years and continuing in ten year increments thereafter.

Rider also testified an oral contract was made between the parties that would allow Rider to rent the property from Holtzner until they retire or sell the business. Holtzner denies the oral contract.

ISSUE

Could Neal Rider enforce the 2008 Agreement and oral agreements forming a lease contract against Rosemary Holtzner?

RULE

Maryland Statute of Frauds for Leases

Under Maryland law, a leasehold interest in land for a term of one year or more must be in writing to comply with the statute of frauds. [Md. Ann. Code (1974, 2010 Repl.) 5-101 & 5-102 of the Real Property Article ("RP")]

Under Maryland law, acourt will not decree specific performance of a contract unless it is definite and certain in all its terms and free from ambiguity." Trotter v. Lewis, 185 Md. 528, 532 (1946).

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Sports Law

Authors: Mark James

3rd Edition

113755925X, 978-1137559258

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Psychological issues associated with officiating/refereeing

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

The personal characteristics of the sender

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

The quality of the argumentation

Answered: 1 week ago