Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

answer these questions fA claim can be brought in regards to more than one tort. An example of a case which involved both a claim

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

answer these questions

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
\fA claim can be brought in regards to more than one tort. An example of a case which involved both a claim for nuisance and negligence is Meadows v. Proctor, 2012 ABPC 360 (CanLII). After reading this case, choose the statement below which is TRUE. Select one: a. The Court applied the principles from the decision in Doucette v Parent to this case. O b. Both parties had lawyers act for them at the trial of this matter. c. The Court held the Defendants liable for negligence O d. The Defendants called three third party witnesses, being a by-law officer, a certified arborist and a security guardA friend is considering bringing an occupiers' liability action to the courts in Alberta, after being injured at a waterpark. You know that there is Alberta legislation in effect which is relevant to this type of action. Based on your research of Alberta's Occupiers' Liability Act. Select one: a. An occupier's liability under this Act in respect of a visitor may be extended, restricted, modified or excluded by express agreement or express notice. b. The Contributory Negligence Act has no application, even where the occupier does not discharge the duty of care owed to the visitor and the visitor suffers damage partly as a result of the fault of the occupier and party as a result of the visitor's own fault. O c. This Act applies to or affects an employer's liability in respect of the employer's duties to employees. d. An occupier owes a duty to every trespasser on the occupier's premises to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that the trespasser will be reasonably safe in using the premises. WA plaintiff who sues in tort must prove each of the elements of the tort. Review the torts below, along with their elements, and compare them to the information contained in your Business Law in Canada textbook. One of the torts below is matched correctly to it's elements. Identify the tort which is CORRECTLY matched to its elements. Select one a. Conspiracy to injure. two or more persons act together using unlawful means to injure the business interests of another. b. Deceit: negligently misleading another person and causing damage. c. Passing off: deliberate interference to someone's reputation, O d. Battery: deliberate threat creating fear of | eminent harm, no consent

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Elliott And Quinns Contract Law

Authors: Frances Quinn

12th Edition

1292251409, 978-1292251400

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

7. How can the models we use have a detrimental effect on others?

Answered: 1 week ago