Anthony Baker testifies in court, under oath, that he saw Mateo rushing away from the store that was robbed. He explains that it was New Years, just a little after midnight. Anthony was walking home from a New Year's Eve party. He recognized Mateo as a fellow student in a class several years ago. When asked if he had any doubt about his identification, he said he was absolutely certain. Guideline 5 states that it is reasonable to accept the evidence of our own experience or that of an eyewitness to an event, unless there is reason to doubt it. What are some considerations that might make us doubt Anthony's testimony? (More than one answer below may be correct.) 13 Anthony admits that the person was running. How was able to be so certain of the identification? Anthony said he was walking home from a New Year's Eve party. How much alcohol had he consumed just prior to identifying the person. Anthony says it was after midnight so he may not have had sufficient light to see the person clearly. If Anthony cannot tell us exactly how fast Mateo was running, then his whole testimony is dubious. Anthony was relying on his memory of what Mateo looked several years earlier. How can he be sure that his memory is reliable?