Antonio bought a parcel of land from Bernardo on installment. When the first installment fell due, A did not pay. His defense was that he did not have available money, and he therefore pleaded impassibility of performance. * O) Antonio's obligation is extinguished because of impossibility of performance. O Antonio's obligation is extinguished because he has no available money. Antonio is liable because the obligation is to pay specific money. O Antonio is liable. A mere pecuniary inability to fulfill an engagement does not discharge the obligation of the contract.Tina supports Katrina, a minor. Tina's support to Katrina is due to the latter's (Katrina) father's refusal to render support. Is Katrina's father obliged to reimburse Tina all the support she gave to Katrina? *0 () Yes, Katrina's father is obliged to reimburse under the principles of delict. Yes, Katrina's father is obliged to reimburse under the principles of quasi-delict. Yes, Katrina's father is obliged to reimburse under the principles of contract. Yes, Katrina's father is obliged to reimburse under the principles of quasi-contract.. Lino entered into a contract to sell with Ramon, undertaking to convey to the latter one of the five lots he owns, without specifying which lot it was, for the price of P1 million. Later, the parties could not agree which of five lots he owned Lino undertook to sell to Ramon. What is the standing of the contract? * O Void O Unenforceable O Voidable RescissioOn 20 March 2021, Charot, a movie producer, met Majal Salvacion, a movie actress. Charot informed Majal that she is producing a movie and that its filming will start on 12 June 2021. Charot offered a role to Majal as the lead actress with a talent fee of $1M. Majal accepted the offer and gave a fist bump to Charot in view of the Covid-19 health protocols to seal their agreement. In turn, Charot gave Majal a check for $1,000.00 as initial payment. On 12 June 2021, wondering that she is not receiving any call from the production team, Majal called Charot about the shooting. However, Charot refused to honor the agreement and argues that it was unenforceable. Do you agree with Charot? * O Yes, Majal cannot insist in enforcing the contract against Charot because it was entered into by the parties orally. No, Majal can enforce the contract against Charot because Majal had already accepted benefits under the contract. O Yes, Majal cannot compel Charot to enforce the agreement because it will amount to involuntary servitude which is prohibited by the Constitution.Alab offered an interest-free loan of #50,000.00. Enticed with Alab's offer, Aurelius availed for himself and signed a promissory note for $50,000.00 payable 6 months after date. At maturity, Aurelius requested Alab an extension of 1 month and offered to pay 20% interest on the loan. Enticed with the 20% interest offer, Alab agreed and extended the maturity of Aurelius' loan. Which of the following statement is correct? * O) The interest is demandable by virtue of the agreement between Alab and Aurelius. O The agreement to pay interest is unenforceable. The extension to pay the loan is valid but the agreement to pay interest is void. O The extension to pay the loan and the agreement to pay interest are both valid