Application/Analysis Paper3

[Note:This activity has been adapted from Application Exercise 8.9]Choose one of the following two options:

1. Develop a strategy for communicating high expectations to someone you lead but do not like. Analyze what expectations you have for that person now and how you communicate these expectations. Identify steps that you can take to create a positive Pygmalion Effect. Is it possible to modify your expectations? To mask your negative feelings? Write up your conclusions.

2. Describe how one of your leaders communicates expectations to you. What kinds of expectations does she or he have of you? Are they positive or negative? How does this person communicate these expectancies? How can you use the Galatea Effect to shape this person's expectations if they are low? Evaluate the behaviors of both yourself and your leader and offer suggestions for improvement.

Your response to this activity should between 750 and 1000 words (the equivalent of 3 to 4 double-spaced pages). Be sure to proofread your work carefully for correct spelling, grammar, and usage.Grammar and punctuation count toward your activitygrade.

Description These papers are written assignments based on application exercises that appear in the text:

• Target Length3 to 4 pages (750 to 1000 words)
• Description of TaskEach paper is fully described in the pertinent assignment.

Rubric Each paper will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

• Fulfillment of Assignment RequirementAll components of the assignment should be completed.
• Depth of Analysis and TransferPaper should demonstrate a thorough, accurate understanding of the concept(s); Should reflect transfer of course material to personal leadership/fellowship experiences.
• Written communicationPaper should be clearly organized, clearly written, and should demonstrate correct spelling, punctuation, and grammar.

Percentage of Grade Taken together the application/analysis papers will count for 15 percent of your final grade (5 percent each).