Question
Are hostile takeovers necessarily bad for firms or their investors? Explain. (Select the best choice below.) A. Yes. They allow new investors to profit at
Are hostile takeovers necessarily bad for firms or their investors? Explain.
(Select the best choice below.)
A.
Yes. They allow new investors to profit at the expense of employees and existing investors. If existing investors and employees were better off being takenover, there would be no reason for the takeover to be hostile.
B.
No. They are a way to discipline managers who are not working in the interests of shareholders.
C.
Yes. They allow the entity taking over, the raider, to make a quick profit. This profit must come from somewhere. The only place is existing shareholders andemployees, so hostile takeovers must be bad for existing shareholders.
D.
Both (A) and (B) are correct answers.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started