Are Women Catching Up? In 1992, researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine published an analysis of data indicating that within 65 years, top female and male runners might perform equally well in the 200-m, 400-m, 800-m and 1500-m runs. Other researchers disputed the claim. What do you think? Let's look at some historical data. Olympic Track Records for 200m) Men's Time Women's Time (sec) (sec 40 38 1948 21.1 24.4 36 1952 20.7 23.7 34 1956 20.6 23.4 32 1960 20.5 24 30 1964 203 23 28 26 1968 19.83 22.5 1972 20 22.4 1...... .6090 1976 20.23 22.37 Time (sec) 1980 20.19 22.03 1984 19.8 21.81 1988 19.75 21.34 1992 20.01 21.81 1996 19.32 22.12 2000 20.09 22.27 2004 19.79 22.05 2008 193 21.74 2012 1932 21.8 1944 1952 1960 1968 1976 1984 1992 2000 2008 2016 Year https://www. olympic.org/athletics/200m-women https://www.olympic. org/athletics/200m-men 1. The graph contains a line graph for the women's record times for the 200-m run. What seems to be true about the points on the graph? 2. Add the men's data to the scatterplot above. 3. Based on the graph, what would you conclude about the men's and women's record times for the 200-m run compared to the researchers at the University of California