Aristotelean or Nichomachean Ethics is not concerned with what to do. Rather it focuses on how to be, it emphasizes the idea that the correct behavior is the result of cultivating virtue and moderation. Thus, if one makes a habit of virtue and avoids excess, the resultant behavior is likely to be ethical. Virtue is eminently practical in that it can be cultivated through practice until it becomes habit this is practical wisdom. How is the approach different from the Utilitarian or Kantian perspectives? Do you feel this is a comprehensive approach is it better or worse than the Kantian and Utilitarian perspectives? Why or why not? Can you use all approaches as per the need? Again follow the format used previously: 1) Explain - State the facts of the issue/case-Who, what, where, when, why (any/all that apply) 2) Position: State your position where required, provide your understanding - support your stand with sound logical reasoning and analysis 3) Illustrate and Exemplify Support your position (2) or your explanation (1) with appropriate examples and illustrations. An illustration is more like an analogy where you can create a metaphorical imagined situation. On the other hand, an example is real world oriented which you can back up with a particular case/source. So, if one is to illustrate the concept that ethical issues are often seen in marketing, one would illustrate this by pointing out that sometimes cartain businesses use deceptive practices like jacking up prices during a crisis situation, and then give a real world example of how.dice.gouging occurred during hurticane Sandy Provide examples from the real world (regearching online and citing the same carries more weight) You can also use examples from your personal experience although these will not be as effective as providing real world business examples When responding to fellow students, you can 1) Point out what you thought was Insightful in the post of what you thought was not agreeable to you 2) Provide reasons for your position Aristotelean or Nichomachean Ethics is not concerned with what to do. Rather it focuses on how to be. It emphasizes the idea that the correct behavior is the result of ultivating virtue and moderation. Thus. If one makes a habit of virtue and avoids excess, the resultant behavior is likely to be ethical. Virtue is eminently practical in that it can be cultivated through practice until it becomes habit this is practical wisdom. How is the approach different from the Utilitarian or Kantian perspectives? Do you feel this is a comprehensive approach, is it better or worse than the Kantian and ilitarian perspectives? Why or why not? Can you use all approaches as per the need? gain follow the format used previously: Explain State the facts of the issue case. Who what, where when why (any all that apply) Position State your position where required, provide your understanding support your stand with sound logical reasoning and analysis b)lustrate and Examplity Support your position (2) or your explanation (1) with appropriate examples and Hlustrations. An illustration is more like an analogy where you can create a metaphorical imagined situation on the other hand, an example is real world oriented which you can back up with a particular case/source. So, if one is to strate the concept that ethical issues are often seen in marketing, one would llustrate this by pointing out that sometimes certain businesses use deceptive practices like jacking up prices during a crisis situation, and then give a real world example of how price.gouping occurred during hurricane Sandy Provide examples from the real world (researching online and citing the same carries more weight) You can also use examples from your personal experience although these will not be as effective as providing real world business examples When responding to follow students, you can Point out what you thought was insightful in the post or what you thought was not agreeable to you. 2) Provide reasons for your position Aristotelean or Nichomachean Ethics is not concerned with what to do. Rather it focuses on how to be, it emphasizes the idea that the correct behavior is the result of cultivating virtue and moderation. Thus, if one makes a habit of virtue and avoids excess, the resultant behavior is likely to be ethical. Virtue is eminently practical in that it can be cultivated through practice until it becomes habit this is practical wisdom. How is the approach different from the Utilitarian or Kantian perspectives? Do you feel this is a comprehensive approach is it better or worse than the Kantian and Utilitarian perspectives? Why or why not? Can you use all approaches as per the need? Again follow the format used previously: 1) Explain - State the facts of the issue/case-Who, what, where, when, why (any/all that apply) 2) Position: State your position where required, provide your understanding - support your stand with sound logical reasoning and analysis 3) Illustrate and Exemplify Support your position (2) or your explanation (1) with appropriate examples and illustrations. An illustration is more like an analogy where you can create a metaphorical imagined situation. On the other hand, an example is real world oriented which you can back up with a particular case/source. So, if one is to illustrate the concept that ethical issues are often seen in marketing, one would illustrate this by pointing out that sometimes cartain businesses use deceptive practices like jacking up prices during a crisis situation, and then give a real world example of how.dice.gouging occurred during hurticane Sandy Provide examples from the real world (regearching online and citing the same carries more weight) You can also use examples from your personal experience although these will not be as effective as providing real world business examples When responding to fellow students, you can 1) Point out what you thought was Insightful in the post of what you thought was not agreeable to you 2) Provide reasons for your position Aristotelean or Nichomachean Ethics is not concerned with what to do. Rather it focuses on how to be. It emphasizes the idea that the correct behavior is the result of ultivating virtue and moderation. Thus. If one makes a habit of virtue and avoids excess, the resultant behavior is likely to be ethical. Virtue is eminently practical in that it can be cultivated through practice until it becomes habit this is practical wisdom. How is the approach different from the Utilitarian or Kantian perspectives? Do you feel this is a comprehensive approach, is it better or worse than the Kantian and ilitarian perspectives? Why or why not? Can you use all approaches as per the need? gain follow the format used previously: Explain State the facts of the issue case. Who what, where when why (any all that apply) Position State your position where required, provide your understanding support your stand with sound logical reasoning and analysis b)lustrate and Examplity Support your position (2) or your explanation (1) with appropriate examples and Hlustrations. An illustration is more like an analogy where you can create a metaphorical imagined situation on the other hand, an example is real world oriented which you can back up with a particular case/source. So, if one is to strate the concept that ethical issues are often seen in marketing, one would llustrate this by pointing out that sometimes certain businesses use deceptive practices like jacking up prices during a crisis situation, and then give a real world example of how price.gouping occurred during hurricane Sandy Provide examples from the real world (researching online and citing the same carries more weight) You can also use examples from your personal experience although these will not be as effective as providing real world business examples When responding to follow students, you can Point out what you thought was insightful in the post or what you thought was not agreeable to you. 2) Provide reasons for your position