Army Crew Case The noteworthy success of the JV team in comparison to the Varsity team stemmed from their superior trust and teamwork dynamics. The JV team exhibited a cohesive and harmonious unit, enabling them to row in synchrony with minimal conflict. In contrast, the Varsity team faced challenges, such as rowing out of time and a lack of mutual trust, resulting in a less synchronized performance. Notably, the JV team members refrained from blaming each other, fostering a positive team atmosphere characterized by shared responsibility and trust. This cohesive environment contributed to the JV team's high collective efficacy, where their combined efforts produced results greater than the sum of their individual capabilities. On the contrary, the Varsity team, with a focus on individual efficacy, experienced a process loss, where the group's overall performance lagged behind the potential of its individual members. This disparity underscores the critical role of teamwork, trust, and collective efficacy in maximizing a crew team's overall success