Arnold Olson and his now-deceased spouse deeded their property to their six children in perpetuity until they die. During a subsequent conversation with his son and daughter-in-law, in the presence of two other children, Olson granted his son part of that property, which included the home and sev-eral buildings, as long as they did not sell it while he was alive, because he wanted to live in a trailer on the property. He then executed a second deed conveying the property but failed to include the life estate in this second deed. The father lived in his trailer on the property for four years. Then the son told him he would have to move because they were selling the property. Olson and his other children sued to have the contract reformed on the grounds of mistake. The trial court agreed and reformed the contract to include the provision for the father's life estate. Why do you think the appellate court either affirmed or reversed the lower court's decision? [Olson v. Olson. 1998 WL 170111.1.) Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).? Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns.? Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties).? Provide a judgment on who should win the case - be clear.? Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.? Be prepared to defend your decision and to objectively evaluate the other points of view