arrested for a misdemeanor battery and was not provided Miranda warnings at that time. He was placed in a "holding pen" while waiting to post bond. Before the suspect could do so, a detective in charge of investigating a string of burglaries noticed that the suspect matched the description of the serial burglar. The detective brought the suspect from the holding pen into a room specifically reserved for interrogation. The detective had the suspect take a seat next to the door, which the detective left open. The detective gave him Miranda warnings and then began questioning him about the burglaries. Caught by surprise that he was being questioned for the burglaries rather than the battery, the suspect signed the rights waiver and provided a statement confessing to the burglaries, On proper motion, should the suspect's statement be suppressed? (A) No, because the suspect was not arrested for burglary and thus was free to leave the interview. O (B) No, because proper Miranda warnings were given. (C) Yes, because the detective failed to inform the suspect that the questioning would be about the burglaries. O (D) Yes, because he should have been provided Miranda warnings when he was