Arrow's impossibility theorem can generate deep suspicion about the legitimacy of any voting method as a mechanism of collective choice. Addressing this suspicion, explain how at least one particular voting method can claim legitimacy (as a reasonable, non-arbitrary way of aggregating preferences or judgments) despite the concerns that Arrow, or other social choice theorists, would raise about it. Why does that method have a distinctive claim to democratic legitimacy, relative to other methods? - Make sure to address potential critiques of thee voting method that you choose