article 1

Effects of combining exercise with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on cognitive function in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial. ,Scientific Reports - X-MOL (x-mol.com

article 2

"The older people, omega-3, and cognitive health (EPOCH) trial design and methodology: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial investigating the effect of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids on cognitive ageing and wellbeing in cognitively healthy older adults"

(https://nutritionj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-2891-10-117)

in this two article please write RCT WORKSHEET paper for this 2 article?

Worksheet question:

Citation:Complete citation -

-Research Question: State the

specific question that the researchers are trying to answer. Typically this

would include the dietary intervention, the major health outcome(s) of

interest, the target population, and a specific effect (increase/decrease, prevent,

etc.).

-Participants: Who was

enrolled in the study? State the characteristics that were required (e.g., age

range, sex, health conditions, etc.). Which factors were excluded from the

study? How many participants? How were they recruited?

-Study Design : State the

type of study design. Describe the framework of the study, including: - How

many groups and how participants were assigned (e.g., randomized) - The

different treatments (interventions), including the amount, timing, form of the

nutrient/food. Describe the control or placebo. Duration of the

intervention/study. - What instructions were given? How did they assess

compliance/adherence? - What was measured? Why? How often?

-Results: State

the major results of the study. Be specific. - Only statistically significant

(SS) differences are considered real changes. If the p-value is

higher, then there is NO significant difference. - Comparing before and after

treatment, did the major outcome of interest change in the intervention group?

In the control group? Were differences between groups found to be statistically

significant? - Be careful not to over-generalize the findings

-Clinical relevance

Applicable to the general population: Was the magnitude of the effect

substantial enough to potentially improve health? Is this intervention simple

or difficult for participants to follow on a long-term basis? Considering the

characteristics of the participants, can these findings apply to the general

population or only to specific groups?

-Strengths of Study: Consider

the study design elements, participants, etc. State the most significant and

obvious strengths of this study. Some things to evaluate: duration of the

study, target population, participant exclusions, minimization of bias (randomization,

placebo, blind or double-blind, etc.), instructions given to the participation,

how the intervention was implemented (providing the actual food vs. guidance),

assessment of compliance/adherence, data collection and analysis.

-Weaknesses of Study:

Consider the study design elements, participants, etc. State the most

significant and obvious weaknesses of this study. Some things to evaluate:

duration of the study, target population, participant exclusions, minimization

of bias (randomization, placebo, blind or double-blind, etc.), instructions

given to the participation, how the intervention was implemented (providing the

actual food vs. guidance), assessment of compliance/adherence, data collection

and analysis.

Your Conclusion:Based on the RESULTS OF THIS STUDY, what is the answer

to the research question? - There will be a logical 'yes' or 'no' regardless of

how strong or weak the study was. Do you think the research question has been

sufficiently answered by this study? What would you like to see done

differently in the next trial?