Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Article 8 of the US Consitution empowers Congress, in part, To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to
Article 8 of the US Consitution empowers Congress, in part, "To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries."
PLEASE NO COPY AND PASTE
In several paragraphs, discuss whether in your view the patent & copyright system in the United States is perfect as it is, or if it should be modified, and in what way. Please justify your response with evidence from an academic-level outside source.
A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING PATENT POLICY THE DANGERS OF THE DANGERS OF MORE TOO-WEAK PATENTS Weak patent protection can lead to suboptimal innovation, since the potential payoff for a private actor may be deemed insufficient for the amount of time and resources put into developing an invention. Because weak rights make it more expensive to protect inventions, firms tend to look inward to solve problems that may otherwise have been more efficiently solved by an. inter-firm partnership Patents (and copyrights) allow employers to see the exact results of the creativity and skill of prospective and current employees. When rights are weak, workers have trouble quantifying their value. Level of Innovative Activity TOO-STRONG PATENTS Expansive patent rights make successive innovative activity more costly. Having to seek permission from all related patent holders bids up the cost of innovation. Overly strong patent rights disproportionately benefit large firms. Larger firms are more likely to use patents to entrench their position in the market, as opposed to small- and medium-sized firms that are more likely to use patents to accumulate revenue and enhance their reputation. When patent rights are stronger, firms with intellectual assets are emboldened to threaten other inventors with litigation. For example, NPES often discourage innovation by more productive innovators. LESS WEAK STRONG Strength of Patent Enforcement KAUFFMAN FOUNDATION HOW INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CAN HELP OR HINDER INNOVATION AN OVERVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY The need to protect the inventions and creative works of individuals has been recognized for centuries. The first modern patent was granted in 1421 to Filippo Brunesileschi by the Republic of Florence for a barge with hoisting gear. Hundreds of years later, the United States Constitution affirmed the importance of protecting "writings and discoveries" in order to promote the progress of science and the useful arts." Intellectual property serves as the foundation of innovation in our economy. Government-granted rights incentivize discovery and creativity by providing creators with an opportunity to profit from the value of their innovative work. In exchange, the creative work is made public so that others may build on and benefit from the work of the original creator. Laws protecting intellectual property also reduce the transaction costs between inventors and industry by providing information about the quality of the invention without jeopardizing the ownership of the idea. For the entrepreneur, intellectual property in the form of patents, trademarks, and copyrights can be especially valuable. Patents for example, have been shown to increase firm productivity and more immediately, a firm's market value. Patent applications held by young firms also correlate with higher valuations by investors, provided those applications are not software-based. But firms can also use patents and other forms of intellectual property in inefficient and anti-competitive ways. Firms may use patents as a strategic deterrent by building up "patent thickets," which make incremental or follow-on innovation by other firms a more challenging and costly process. Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) also have been identified by many policymakers as a costly impediment to innovation and economic growth. Sufficient intellectual property protection is key to promoting innovation. However , tweaks to intellectual property rights can shift incentives in ways that either encourage more or less innovation, depending on how strong or weak the existing intellectual property rights are. TM FORMS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION A set of exclusive rights granted to an inventor by the government in exchange for a public disclosure of the invention. The invention must be useful, novel, and nonobvious. A word, name, symbol, or device used with a good or brand to distinguish from other goods or brands. PATENT - A set of legal rights designated by the government to the creator of an original work. Allows creator to use, reproduce, and display work and receive compensation COPYRIGHT TRADEMARK Length of Protection: 15-20 years Length of Protection: Life of creator + 70 years Percentage of startups surveyed that had at least one patent: 2.6% (source) Companies with most patents issued in 2014 (as of Dec 1): IBM, Samsung, Canon, Sony, Microsoft source Percentage of startups surveyed that had at least one copyright: 7.4% (source) Copyright industries contribution to GDP (2012): $1.765 trillion (10.9%) Length of Protection: Indefinite as long as mark is still in use and owner renews mark every ten years Percentage of startups surveyed that had at least one trademark: 13.7% (source) Top trademark applicants in 2014 (as of Dec 1): Mattel, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Samsung, King.com (source) (source)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started