Article case analysis on The Death Penalty and Gender Discrimination by Elizabeth Rapaport

1. **Introduction**: Start by identifying the author's main argument or thesis statement. What is Rapaport's stance on the death penalty and gender discrimination?

2. **Summary**: Summarize the main points that the author makes to support her argument. This could include statistical evidence, historical context, or legal precedents.

3. **Analysis**: Analyze the author's use of evidence. Is it convincing? Why or why not? Consider the author's use of language and rhetoric. How does she frame the issue of the death penalty and gender discrimination?

4. **Context**: Consider the broader context of the article. How does it fit into the larger conversation about the death penalty and gender discrimination?

5. **Conclusion**: Finally, evaluate the overall effectiveness of the article. Did the author make a compelling argument? What are the implications of her argument for the future of the death penalty and gender discrimination?