Article: Cohesion and leadership in individual sports: a social network analysis of participation in recreational running groups

Do not worry about summarizing the content of the article as we will all have read it. Instead, your critique should focus on answering questions such as:

Was the method appropriate?

How would you have conducted the study differently?

What did the authors do well?

Was the purpose and significance clearly stated?

What does this study add to the field of sport management?