As a senior partner at one of the nation's largest public accounting firms, you serve as chair- person of the firm's financial reporting policy committee. You are also the firm's chief spokesperson on financial reporting matters that come before the FASB and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The year is 2017. Two new debt securities have caught the attention of your committee, the FASB, the SEC, Congress, and the Treasury Department. Draper, Inc. recently completed a $200 million offer ing of so-called century bonds that mature in 2117, or in 100 years. Castle Company announced that it will issue $250 million of millennium bonds that mature in 3017, or in 1,000 years. Neither company is a client of your firm. The treasury department and Congress have proposed limiting interest deductions for long-term bonds to 40 years. They argue that 100-year debt should be treated the same as equity because the bonds are more like permanent capital. Their reasoning is that given that stock dividend payments cannot be deducted from taxable income, interest payments on the last 60 years of 100-year debt should not be deducted. Required: 1. Suppose that Draper, Inc., issued its $200 million century bonds on January 1, 2017, at a market yield of 7.5%, the same as the stated interest rate. To keep things easy, also assume that the bonds pay interest just once a year, on December 31. Compute the bonds' issue price. How much of that price comes from the present value of the interest pay ments, and how much comes from the promised principal payment? 2. In present value terms, how much of a tax savings does the company obtain from its cen- tury bond? (Use a 35% effective tax rate.) How much of a tax savings would be lost if only the first 40 years of interest deductions were allowed