As an experienced fraud examiner asked to investigate possible fraud at a local nonprofit organization, you suspect that one of the workers, Stacey, has been embezzling money. After investigating and securing enough evidence to be confident of Stacey's involvement, you speak with the president of the organization, Jamie. Jamie assures you that Stacey could not be doing anything wrong, that she has known Stacey for many years, and that Stacey is a good person. Further, she indicates that because of her relationship with Stacey, even if there was some wrongdoing involving Stacey, no action would be taken with respect to the potential fraud.

1. How do you respond to Jamie and explain to her what is at stake?