As described by the Supreme Court in Shelley v. Krae ner, the neighborhood dist, let described in the racially restrictive covena - whet aile_ed y burdened the Shelley s I .nd; **Incuded fifty-s_ve.. _arcels of land. The thirty owners who signed the agreen _nt held itl_ to forty-s_ven parcels. Including the partic lar par.I involved in this . ase. it the tin-e the agreen.ent ..assigned, five of the parcels in the district .. ere owned by " lezrue.. ~ ne of thoe had been vcouple by Negro families _ince lob. nearly thirty years . efore the re-trictive agreement was excuted. The trial court found that ov.ners of seven out of nine horne: on the south side of Lavaule Avenue. within the restricted aliric. and "In the Immediate vicinity of the premises In question. had failed tu tig:. the restrictive a_reement in 1. 11. At the time this action wa. brought. four of the premises were occupled by negroes, and had been Ju occupled fur perlods rang Ing from twenty three to sixty three years A fifth parcel had been orcupled by Nerves until a year before this suit was Instituted "