Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

As part of an upgrade of the country rail network, VicRail, a government-owned enterprise with responsibility for running the network, automated all signal boxes. After

As part of an upgrade of the country rail network, VicRail, a government-owned enterprise with responsibility for running the network, automated all signal boxes. After the automation, no manual signalling at level crossings was possible. However, to minimise the risk in connection with driver error or brake failure, VicRail installed "piston-breaks" on each train. These were designed to halt a train very quickly where the brakes had failed or where a train was on a collision course approaching a level crossing. There was a slight risk of derailment. On 8 June 2015, Wang Li was travelling home to Geelong on a VicRail train when the brakes failed approaching the main level crossing. The "piston-breaks" were activated, but because the train stopped suddenly on a bend, several carriages were derailed. Wang Li was in one of those carriages. He was seated near an open window and was thrown from the train onto the embankment. He suffered horrific injuries. Many other passengers were also injured.

Police, ambulances and television crews were on the scene in minutes. Wang Li's old friend, Jerry Guo, was watching the disaster as it unfolded on the television. The television camera focused on a badly injured person being rescued from the embankment. Jerry recognised Wang Li and saw the horrific injuries he had suffered. Jerry was traumatised and continues to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder. After things settled down, both Wang Li and Jerry seek your advice about whether to sue VicRail in negligence. Please advise:

(a) whether VicRail owes Wang Li and/or Jerry Guo a duty of care; and

(b) assume for the purposes of part (b) only that VicRail owes a duty of care, whether VicRail breached its duty of care? [Note that VicRail, after conducting a cost-benefit analysis, rejected the installation of a sophisticated system of "catch-points" that would have significantly reduced the risk of derailment. To install the "catch-points" would have cost VicRail over $50 million and taken two years to install. The "piston-breaks" cost less than $2 million to install and could be done very easily and quickly.]

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Tort Law

Authors: Kirsty Horsey, Erika Rackley

7th Edition

019886776X, 978-0198867760

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Date the application was sent

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

2.3 Define human resource ethics.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

9 How can training be evaluated?

Answered: 1 week ago