As the engineer of the $11.5 billion planned purchase of Sears, Roebuck & Co. by Kmart Holding Corp.,

Edward Lampert is stepping out of the shadows of Wall Street to make a highprofile bet that the

fortunes of not just one but two retailing giants can be turned around. He keeps his strategy close to the

vest, and his fortune is uncertain, though it was estimated at $2 billion ahead of the acquisition news.

Mr. Lamperts hedgefund firm, ESL Investments inc., which owns 43 million shares of Kmart, and 31

million shares of Sears, recorded paper gains of nearly $600 million in the wake of the takeover news.

He knew that was a spectacular oneday return given that market interest rates were 6%.

Shortsellers have been wary of Kmart ever since it emerged from bankruptcy in early May 2003. After

Mr. Lampert bought up some $1 billion of Kmarts distressed debt in 2002, he kicked off an aggressive

restructuring campaign that included closing stores and selling off real estate to competitors. Investors

were so enamored of his results that they helped to double Kmarts stock price in the past 18 months

from $58 per share to the current value of $120 per share.

The SEC filing also included a new employment contract for Sears chief executive Alan Lacy, who is

slated to be CEO and vice chairman of the combined company, Sears Holdings Corp. Under the

employment pact, which runs for 5 years after the mergers effective date, Lacy is entitled to a minimum

base salary of $1.5 million a year and a target annual bonus of 150% of the base salary.

An acquirers brand typically is the one that goes forward, but companies have been known to flout the

rule based on whose brand is stronger in the marketplace. When Nations Bank bought Bank of America,

the merged company took the Bank of America name and rebranded all the Nations Bank branches.

Asked to comment on the Kmart / Sears deal, an analyst said I dont think the combined company will

be a much more significant challenge to WalMart. Consumers think that when they want price they go

to WalMart. When they want value a little fashion they go to Target. After hearing this, Mr.

Lampert began to wonder if he had made the correct decision. I wonder, he thought to himself,

would I have been better off buying Target instead? Although it was too late, he began to look at the

financials for Target to see if he would have been better off buying Target.

Income Statements January 31, 2004

(All numbers in thousands)

Wal-Mart Kmart Sears Target

Sales 258,681,000 23,253,000 41,124,000 48,163,000

Cost of Sales 198,747,000 17,846,000 26,231,000 31,790,000

Gross Profit 59,934,000 5,407,000 14,893,000 16,373,000

Administrative Expenses 44,909,000 4,998,000 9,111,000 11,534,000

EBIT 15,025,000 409,000 5,782,000 4,839,000

Interest 996,000 162,000 1,025,000 559,000

Taxes (@ 35 %) 4,910,150 86,450 1,664,950 1,498,000

Net Income 9,118,850 160,550 3,092,050 2,782,000

Balance Sheets as at January 31, 2004

(All numbers in thousands)

Wal-Mart Kmart Sears Target

Cash and cash equivalents 5,199,000 2,088,000 9,057,000 816,000

Receivables 1,254,000 301,000 3,397,000 5,776,000

Inventory 26,612,000 3,238,000 5,335,000 5,373,000

Total Current Assets 33,065,000 5,627,000 17,789,000 11,965,000

Property, Plant & Equip. 58,530,000 153,000 6,788,000 16,969,000

Other Assets 6,079,000 120,000 908,000 1,495,000

Total Assets 97,674,000 5,900,000 25,485,000 30,429,000

Accounts Payable 31,051,000 1,772,000 7,582,000 7,448,000

Other current Liabilities 6,367,000 1,050,000 5,194,000 866,000

Total current liabilities 37,418,000 2,822,000 12,776,000 8,314,000

Long term Debt 20,099,000 2,297,000 4,718,000 10,217,000

Common stock 431,000 208,000 823,000 96,000

Retained Earnings 39,726,000 573,000 7,168,000 11,802,000

Total Liabilities & Equity 97,674,000 5,900,000 25,485,000 30,429,000

1. Which firm is most liquid?

2. What is the return to shareholders?

3. What is the NPV of buying Sears?

4. What is the PV of Mr. Lacys pay package?

5. How could we find the greatest underperforming area for any of the firms