As you learned in the previous chapters, Current Designs has two main product lines-composite kayaks, which are handmade and very labour-intensive, and rotomoulded kayaks, which require less labour but use more expensive equipment. Current Designs' controller, Debra King, is now evaluating several methods of assigning overhead to these products. It is important to ensure that costs are appropriately assigned to the company's products. At the same time, the system that is used must not be so complex that its costs are greater than its benefits. Debra has decided to use the following activities and costs to evaluate the methods of assigning overhead. Activity Cost Designing new models $120,000 Creating and testing prototypes 160,000 Creating moulds for kayaks 168,000 Operating the oven for the rotomoulded kayaks 42,000 Operating the vacuum line for the composite kayaks 26,000 Supervising production employees 175,000 Curing (the time that is needed for the chemical processes to finish before the next step in the production process; many of these costs are related to the space required in the building) 221,000 Total $912,000 As Debra examines the data, she decides that the cost of operating the oven for the rotomoulded kayaks and the cost of operating the vacuum line for the composite kayaks can be directly assigned to each of these product lines and do not need to be allocated with the other costs. For purposes of this analysis, assume that Current Designs uses $231,000 in direct labour costs to produce 1,000 composite kayaks and $296,500 in direct labour costs to produce 4,000 rotomoulded kayaks each year. One method of allocating overhead would assign the common costs to each product line by using an allocation basis such as the number of employees working on each type of kayak or the amount of factory space used for the production of each type of kayak. Debra knows that about 50% of the area of the plant and 50% of the employees relate to the composite kayaks, and the remaining space and other employees are used for the rotomoulded kayaks. Using this information, and remembering that the costs of operating the oven and the vacuum lines have been directly assigned, determine the total amount to be assigned to the composite kayak line and the rotomoulded kayak line, and the amount to be assigned to of the units in each line. (Round cost assigned per unit to 2 decimal places, e.g. 125.25.) Composite Rotomoulded Total cost assigned $ $ Cost assigned per unit $ $ Another method of allocating overhead is to use direct labour dollars as an allocation basis. Remembering that the costs of operating the oven and the vacuum line have been assigned directly to the product lines, assign the remaining costs using direct labour dollars as the allocation basis. Then, determine the amount of overhead that should be assigned to each of the units in each line. (Round cost assigned per unit to 2 decimal places, e.g. 125.25.) Composite Rotomoulded Total cost assigned $ $ Cost assigned per unit ta $ ta $ Activity-based costing requires a cost driver for each cost pool. Use the following information to assign the costs to the product lines using the activity-based costing approach. Driver Amount for Composite Kayaks Driver Amount for Rotomoulded Kayaks Activity Cost Driver Designing new models Number of models 3 1 Creating and testing prototypes Number of prototypes 6 2 Creating moulds for kayaks Number of moulds 11 1 Supervising production employees Number of employees 13 12 Curing Number of days of curing time 15,000 2,000 What amount of overhead should be assigned to each composite kayak using this method? What amount of overhead should be assigned to each rotomoulded kayak using this method? (Round cost assigned per unit to 2 decimal places, e.g. 125.25.) Composite Rotomoulded Total cost assigned $ $ Cost assigned per unit $ $
