Ashley, a painter, buys a large selection of paints from four paint manufacturers which she wants to combine to create unique sets of paint.She makes various paint combinations and produces three such unique paint products from those combinations.Please discuss each of the following with reasons

A)Suppose that Ashely develops a terrible rash as a result of one of the paint combinations and Evidence shows that one of the four paints in that combination is causing her rash due to a faulty ingredient and there is one paint from each of the four manufacturers she used but it is impossible to determine which paint and which manufacturer is responsible for that ingredient or paint. Ashly used the following percent of paint from each of the four manufacturers in the paint combination causing her trouble.Rustic....20%Home....30%Style....10%andCottage40%.A jury awards Ashley $ 30,000 for her harm. How much will each manufacturer have to pay Ashley under these facts and under what legal doctrine?(5 pts )

B)Suppose that the evidence shows that Ashley developed her rash as a result of combining all of these paints and you are a lawyer for Cottage, one of the manufacturers. Ashley decides to sue your company for her harm. How will you defend your employer and why?( 5 pts )

C)Suppose that Ashley buys apaint calledOrange Juice which comes in a can with the name Orange Juice clearly shown.The paint is orange and smells just like orange juice.Ashley's five -year -old son Mark drinks the paint and becomes very sick so Ashley sues the paint company for her son's harms. Evidence shows that the paint had no warning label on it.As Ashley's lawyer you know she should have been more careful where she put the paint, but can you argue anything in support of your client's lawsuit claim?Yes or no and why either way(5 pts )

D)Suppose that evidence shows that one of the paints bought by Ashley, called Garden Purple, claims to improve the customer's ability to sleep at night. This claim is found to be completely false and the company's research is found to be either fake or greatly exaggerated.The company is found to have committed false advertising by the government. What four things can the government do to punish the company and/or make them correct their wrong? Under what Federal Agency?( 5 pts )