Assessment 4 Qualitative Interview Review DUE DATE Sunday 2 April 2023 WORTH 20 marks Aim This exercise provides you with experience in listening, watching, note taking and assessing a qualitative interview Instructions WATCH the training interview provided (42 mins) Included as additional resources in Canvas Training video interviews with people with disability (in Panopto) READ the interview schedule (ie the interview questions) provided Interview question schedule people with disability docx REVIEW the additional resource materials list links in this document and read watch as needed Considering information from 1, 2 and 3 above, ANSWER questions 1 to 5 using the Table provided below See word limit recommendations for each question in the table OPTIONAL Take time for your own reflection using the table just before the grading rubric which asks you a few questions about your experience with this assessment No Question to address Your response 1 a What type of interview style was employed Refer to Turner (2010) b Explain why you picked that style c Identify two aspects of the interview which demonstrate your choice of interview style and include the time stamp as part of your evidence Word limit 100 300 words a b c aspect 1 c aspect 2 2 The paper by Kvale states that an interview is a conversation that has a structure and a purpose and that it goes beyond the spontaneous (p6) But the recorded interview example you are reviewing still contains spontaneity a To what extent are the interviewers questions and the interviewees answers spontaneous b Give one specific example for the interviewer and one for the interviewee being spontaneous, and include each time stamp as part of your evidence Word limit 100 250 words a b interviewer b interviewee 3 a The Turner paper has a section on follow up questions (p758) In what ways does the interviewer follow up and clarify the meanings of the interviewees answers b Give two specific examples and include the time stamps as part of your evidence Word limit 100 300 words a b Using the paper by Qu and Dumay (2011) answer the following questions and provide evidence of where it occurs in the interview 4 a Comment on how the interviewer maintained a positive relationship with the interviewee b Give two specific examples and include the time stamps as part of your evidence Word limit 100 300 words a b 5 In Qu and Dumay, p48 they note that the flow of the interviewees story can be inadvertently disrupted by the interviewer, such as by redirecting the narrative or interrupting it a Look for where how the interviewer redirected the narrative give one specific example for this and include the time stamp as part of your evidence Describe WHY you feel they redirected the narrative b Look for where how the interviewer interrupted the interviewee give one specific example for this and include the time stamp as part of your evidence Word limit 200 500 words a b Additional resource materials list links YouTube link https www youtube com watch v A VhzWKaHB4 Paper Writing Interview Protocols and Conducting Interviews Tips for Students New to the Field of Qualitative Research Paper Qualitative Interview Design A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators Paper Reflecting on Novice Qualitative Interviewer Mistakes Paper Considering quality in qualitative interviewing Paper Kvale, S (1996) Chapter 1 Interviewing as Research InterViews An introduction to qualitative research interviewing Sage Publications, Inc Paper the qualitative research interview TIME FOR YOUR OWN REFLECTION No references needed, not included in the marking, just something you may wish to do If these questions prompt you to want to talk further let me know and I can organise that 1 What stood out to you, from the interview overall 2 Was there something from this assessment that you found helpful What was it, and in what way was it helpful 3 Share some important points you may have learned from this assessment Assessment 4 Qualitative Interview Review grading rubric Criteria Marking range Lower marks quality answer Higher marks quality answer Score out of 20 1a What type of interview style was employed Refer to Turner (2010) 1b Explain why you picked that style 1c Identify two aspects of the interview which demonstrate your choice of interview style and include the time stamp as part of your evidence Word limit 100 300 words No interview style referred to Or a style unrelated to qualitative interviewing and or the Turner paper No, or poor explanation of argument towards picking that style One or fewer aspects of the interview identified, that demonstrate choice of style Provides a specific answer to type of interview style, relevant to qualitative research and the Turner paper Explanation is sound, with arguments towards picking that style grounded in the Turner paper and evidence from the interview itself Two aspects of the interview identified correctly and clearly, with time stamps for each provided 4 2a To what extent are the interviewers questions and the interviewees answers spontaneous 2b Give one specific example for the interviewer and one for the interviewee being spontaneous, and include each time stamp as part of your evidence Word limit 100 250 words Does not demonstrate understanding of spontaneity during qualitative interviewing, provides unrelated information as answer or incorrect answer Does not provide a clear or specific example of the interviewer interviewee being spontaneous, and or no time stamp provided Evidence of understanding of spontaneity during qualitative interviewing, identifies example(s) clearly and presents an excellent description of the extent the interviewer interviewees answers were spontaneous Provides a clear and very specific example of this from the interview with time stamp provided 4 3a In what ways does the interviewer follow up and clarify the meanings of the interviewees answers 3b Give two specific examples and include the time stamps as part of your evidence Word limit 100 300 words No recognition of interviewer follow up or clarification during interview example, or incorrect example identified No time stamps provided or does not match the examples of follow up or clarification Demonstrates a clear understanding of interviewer actions during the interview, identifies where interviewer follow up occurred to clarify interviewee meanings, or provides a clear and relevant argument if follow up or clarification wasnt present Provided two specific examples of the interviewer follow up or clarification (or lack of it, if that is your argument), and time stamps provided 4 4a Comment on how the interviewer maintained a positive relationship with the interviewee 4b Give two specific examples and include the time stamps as part of your evidence Word limit 100 300 words No clear or relevant answer provided on how the interviewer maintained a positive relationship with the interviewee One or fewer examples provided, and or time stamps missing, or two examples provided but were not relevant to the question Recognised and identified what might be a positive relationship between interviewer and interviewee, provided clear and relevant comment on how the interviewer maintained a positive relationship with the interviewee OR, a clear and relevant argument was presented as to lack of a positive relationship Provided two specific examples of the positive relationship (or negative, if that is your argument), and time stamps provided 4 5a Look for where how the interviewer redirected the narrative give one specific example for this and include the time stamp as part of your evidence Describe WHY you feel they redirected the narrative 5b Look for where how the interviewer interrupted the interviewee give one specific example for this and include the time stamp as part of your evidence Word limit 200 500 words Does not demonstrate understanding of redirecting narrative in qualitative interviewing or interviewer interruptions, no clear description of why redirection occurred in the interview, provides unrelated information as answer or incorrect answer Does not provide a clear or specific example of the redirection or interruption and or no time stamp provided Addressed each of the types of questions in turn 5a and 5b clearly describing redirection of narrative, good and relevant description as to why it occurred and giving a specific and clear example with time stamp Gives a specific example for interviewer interrupting the interviewee with correct time stamp provided 4 Attachments Assessment 4 docx

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on May 24, 2024

Assessment 4 Qualitative Interview Review DUE DATE Sunday 2 April 2023 WORTH 20 marks Aim This exercise provides you with experience in listening, watching, note

Assessment 4 Qualitative Interview Review DUE DATE Sunday 2 April 2023 WORTH 20 marks Aim This exercise provides you with experience in listening, watching, note taking and assessing a qualitative interview. Instructions

WATCH the training interview provided (42 mins) Included as additional resources in Canvas Training video interviews with people with disability (in Panopto)

READ the interview schedule (ie. the interview questions) provided - Interview question schedule_people with disability.docx

REVIEW the additional resource materials list / links in this document and read / watch as needed.

Considering information from 1, 2 and 3 above, ANSWER questions 1 to 5 using the Table provided below. See word limit recommendations for each question in the table.

OPTIONAL - Take time for your own reflection using the table just before the grading rubric which asks you a few questions about your experience with this assessment.

No.	Question to address	Your response
1	[a] What type of interview style was employed? Refer to Turner (2010) [b] Explain why you picked that style. [c] Identify two aspects of the interview which demonstrate your choice of interview style and include the time stamp as part of your evidence. Word limit 100 300 words	[a] [b] [c] aspect 1 [c] aspect 2
2	The paper by Kvale states that an interview is a conversation that has a structure and a purpose and that it goes beyond the spontaneous (p6). But the recorded interview example you are reviewing still contains spontaneity. [a] To what extent are the interviewers questions and the interviewees answers spontaneous? [b] Give one specific example for the interviewer and one for the interviewee being spontaneous, and include each time stamp as part of your evidence. Word limit 100 250 words	[a] [b] interviewer [b] interviewee
3	[a] The Turner paper has a section on follow up questions (p758). In what ways does the interviewer follow up and clarify the meanings of the interviewees answers? [b] Give two specific examples and include the time stamps as part of your evidence. Word limit 100 300 words	[a] [b]
Using the paper by Qu and Dumay (2011) answer the following questions and provide evidence of where it occurs in the interview
4	[a] Comment on how the interviewer maintained a positive relationship with the interviewee. [b] Give two specific examples and include the time stamps as part of your evidence. Word limit 100 300 words	[a] [b]
5	In Qu and Dumay, p48 they note that the flow of the interviewees story can be inadvertently disrupted by the interviewer, such as by redirecting the narrative or interrupting it. [a] Look for where / how the interviewer redirected the narrative - give one specific example for this and include the time stamp as part of your evidence. Describe WHY you feel they redirected the narrative. [b] Look for where / how the interviewer interrupted the interviewee give one specific example for this and include the time stamp as part of your evidence. Word limit 200 500 words	[a] [b]

Additional resource materials list / links

YouTube link	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-VhzWKaHB4
Paper	Writing Interview Protocols and Conducting Interviews: Tips for Students New to the Field of Qualitative Research
Paper	Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators
Paper	Reflecting on Novice Qualitative Interviewer Mistakes
Paper	Considering quality in qualitative interviewing
Paper	Kvale, S. (1996). Chapter 1: Interviewing as Research. InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Inc.
Paper	the qualitative research interview

TIME FOR YOUR OWN REFLECTION No references needed, not included in the marking, just something you may wish to do If these questions prompt you to want to talk further let me know and I can organise that

[1] What stood out to you, from the interview overall? ..

[2] Was there something from this assessment that you found helpful? What was it, and in what way was it helpful? .

[3] Share some important points you may have learned from this assessment ....................

Assessment 4 Qualitative Interview Review grading rubric

Criteria	Marking range Lower marks/ quality answer Higher marks/ quality answer	Score out of 20
[1a] What type of interview style was employed? Refer to Turner (2010) [1b] Explain why you picked that style. [1c] Identify two aspects of the interview which demonstrate your choice of interview style and include the time stamp as part of your evidence. Word limit 100 300 words	No interview style referred to. Or a style unrelated to qualitative interviewing and/or the Turner paper. No, or poor explanation of argument towards picking that style. One or fewer aspects of the interview identified, that demonstrate choice of style.		Provides a specific answer to type of interview style, relevant to qualitative research and the Turner paper. Explanation is sound, with arguments towards picking that style grounded in the Turner paper and evidence from the interview itself. Two aspects of the interview identified correctly and clearly, with time stamps for each provided.	4
[2a] To what extent are the interviewers questions and the interviewees answers spontaneous? [2b] Give one specific example for the interviewer and one for the interviewee being spontaneous, and include each time stamp as part of your evidence. Word limit 100 250 words	Does not demonstrate understanding of spontaneity during qualitative interviewing, provides unrelated information as answer or incorrect answer. Does not provide a clear or specific example of the interviewer / interviewee being spontaneous, and / or no time stamp provided.		Evidence of understanding of spontaneity during qualitative interviewing, identifies example(s) clearly and presents an excellent description of the extent the interviewer / interviewees answers were spontaneous. Provides a clear and very specific example of this from the interview with time stamp provided.	4
[3a] In what ways does the interviewer follow up and clarify the meanings of the interviewees answers? [3b] Give two specific examples and include the time stamps as part of your evidence. Word limit 100 300 words	No recognition of interviewer follow up or clarification during interview example, or incorrect example identified. No time stamps provided or does not match the examples of follow up or clarification.		Demonstrates a clear understanding of interviewer actions during the interview, identifies where interviewer follow up occurred to clarify interviewee meanings, or provides a clear and relevant argument if follow up or clarification wasnt present. Provided two specific examples of the interviewer follow up or clarification (or lack of it, if that is your argument), and time stamps provided.	4
[4a] Comment on how the interviewer maintained a positive relationship with the interviewee. [4b] Give two specific examples and include the time stamps as part of your evidence. Word limit 100 300 words	No clear or relevant answer provided on how the interviewer maintained a positive relationship with the interviewee. One or fewer examples provided, and / or time stamps missing, or two examples provided but were not relevant to the question.		Recognised and identified what might be a positive relationship between interviewer and interviewee, provided clear and relevant comment on how the interviewer maintained a positive relationship with the interviewee / OR, a clear and relevant argument was presented as to lack of a positive relationship. Provided two specific examples of the positive relationship (or negative, if that is your argument), and time stamps provided.	4
[5a] Look for where / how the interviewer redirected the narrative - give one specific example for this and include the time stamp as part of your evidence. Describe WHY you feel they redirected the narrative. [5b] Look for where / how the interviewer interrupted the interviewee give one specific example for this and include the time stamp as part of your evidence. Word limit 200 500 words	Does not demonstrate understanding of redirecting narrative in qualitative interviewing or interviewer interruptions, no clear description of why redirection occurred in the interview, provides unrelated information as answer or incorrect answer. Does not provide a clear or specific example of the redirection or interruption and / or no time stamp provided.		Addressed each of the types of questions in turn 5a and 5b clearly describing redirection of narrative, good and relevant description as to why it occurred and giving a specific and clear example with time stamp. Gives a specific example for interviewer interrupting the interviewee with correct time stamp provided.	4