Question
Assignment 1 Part B - Non-consequential ethical analysis Due: 11 pm 21 April 2019 Word guide :750 Weighting :20% This assignment is a continuation of
Assignment 1 Part B -
Non-consequential ethical analysis
Due:11 pm 21 April 2019
Word guide:750
Weighting:20%
This assignment is a continuation of Assignment 1 Part A and you must analyse the same ethical question which you defined in Part A.
Restate your ethical question from Assignment 1Part A on page 1 of Assignment 1 Part B. You can modify the precise wording of your ethical question drawing on feedback provided in Assignment 1 Part A.
a)Identify the act central to your ethical question.
(Note: you are analysing the ethics of this specific act.)
(1 mark- Marking Criteria: Understand concepts)
b)Identify 2 virtues relevant to the morality of the act central to your specific ethical question. Define each virtue in no more than one sentence.
(2 marks- Marking Criteria: Understand concepts, Apply theory)
c)Discuss the morality of the act central to your ethical question by comparison with your 2 chosen virtues.
(2 marks- Marking Criteria: Apply theory, Analyse and interpret information)
d)Apply Kant's categorical imperative by completing the following tasks. You need to support any yes/no answers with reasons.
i)Define a specific rule which authorises the act central to your ethical question.
(2 marks- Marking Criteria: Apply theory)
ii)Define the general rule which authorises the act central to your ethical question.
(1 mark- Marking Criteria: Apply theory)
iii)Is the general rule inherently self-contradictory? Why or why not?
(2 marks- Marking Criteria: Critical thinking)
iv)Does the general rule violate Kant's practical imperative or any of Kant's other absolute moral rules?
(2 marks- Marking Criteria: Apply theory, Understand concepts)
v)Is the general rule contrary to its fundamental purpose?
(1 mark- Marking Criteria: Critical thinking)
vi)Is the act ethical according to Kant's ethical system?
(2 marks- Marking Criteria: Apply theory)
e)Provide an ethical conclusion by comparing your conclusions from the act utilitarian analysis in Assignment 1Part A, your virtue ethics and Kantian analyses inAssignment1 Part B, and drawing on your own ethical conscience.
(5 marks- Marking Criteria: Apply theory, Understand concepts, Analyse and interpret information, Clarity of language
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started