Assignment 1 Provide analyses of the cases van Wyk v van Wyk [2013] NAHCMD 125 (available here) and Sibonga v Chaka and Another [2016] NASC 16 (available here), comparing and contrasting the reasons for the decisions and the decisions of the Courts. What theories of law do you consider relevant and that may be used as the jurisprudenceal basis for the decision in each case? You must explain your answers with reference to appropriate authorities