Assignment Task As an experiment, a charity decides to use SMART to determine a shortlist from the seven applicants who have applied for the post of Regional Officer for the Western Region. The main riteria which will be used to compare candidates are: salary they would expect (SALARY), their experience of charity work (CHARITY EXP), their managerial experience (MANAGEMENT EXP), their educational qualifications (EDUCATION), their apparent commitment to the charity's ork (COMMITMENT) and the quality of the ideas they put forward on the form (IDEAS). (a) Discuss if the weights of the attributes are appropriate. If so, why do you think so? If not, why do you think the weights are not appropriate? (You don't need to discuss whether the attributes are appropriate. Only focus on the \"weights\". This is your own opinion and subjective. You don't need references for this.) The personnel manager ranked all the criteria, except salary, in order of importance and then assigned weights as follows: COMMITMENT MANAGEMENT EXP DEAS CHARITY EXP EDUCATION andidate A's aggregated score is 50. You don't need to worry about how 50 was calculated.) he other candidates' aggregated scores are found below. (b) The aggregated scores for all the candidates are given below, together with their expected salaries. Assuming that the personnel manager''s model is appropriate, determine the best 2-3 candidates. You need to create a scatter plot chart. Choose 2-3 candidates. Candidate Expected sala A |50 | 46,000 __ 40,000 42,000 60,000 % 20 | 54,000 62 49 42,000 (c) If the personnel manager reckons that the charity would be prepared to pay 1,000 for the 1 extra score, all else remaining equal, determine which candidate she should recommend for the appointment prior to the interview. Justify your recommendation