Assume a partnership exists between Vlad, Lea, and Tristan and the state in which the business exists has the following statute: "177.1 (a) No partner shall have the right to withdraw any portion of partner's capital contribution until the dissolution of the partnership or rightful disassociation of the partner; (b) A payment or advance made by a partner to cover the obligation of a partnership constitutes a loan to the partnership which accrues reasonable interest from the date of the payment or advance." What is Lea's strongest argument for why she is entitled to a payment of $63,333 as opposed to $50,000?