Assume that Larry has had to use force in self-defense to repel the attack of Herb. Herb has been badly injured as a result. The prosecutor charges Larry with Felonious Assault. Larry makes a Self-Defense argument. He says that he was required to use force to protect himself from death or great bodily harm. From what "point of view" will the jury assess whether Larry was justified in using force against Herb? (Use the Majority Rule and the one used in Ohio) From Larry's subjective point of view From Herb's (the victim) subjective point of view From the point of view of "an objectively reasonable third person" From the judge's point of view