Assume that you may have to deal with some political fallout and make a presentation accordingly.

As with any evaluation, political fallout is always a possibility. This is particularly true when evaluating a program administered by a large organization like the YMCA. To prepare for this, it is essential to have a well-developed presentation that can be used to present the evaluation's findings to the organization's decision-makers.

I don't know how to do the presentation. How should I write it? If there is a sample to follow. I know that it should be concise, clear, and simple to comprehendalso detailing how the evaluation's results will be used to enhance the after-school program. But I don't know how to write it.

This are some findings

Key Findings

The CDLI's focus on Y staff and volunteers was a relatively different approach for Y-USA than other recent interventions. Many previous interventionssuch as the Achievement Gapprimarily focused on direct work with youth through specific curricula. The CDLI was a framework that offered flexibility in how each Y could implement it.

To assess the effects of participating in the CDLI, we analyzed surveys that staff and volunteers completed from fall 2019 through spring 2020 to assess changes over time in their skills related to promoting character development among youth. We also examined whether staff and volunteers at Ys with higher organizational capacity were more likely to report improvements, and whether receiving support from technical assistants versus CDLI hub Ys was related to improvement. Our key findings are as follows:

At the beginning of CDLI implementation, staff and volunteers were most confident in their skills related to safe environments and empowerment. Across all cohorts, programs scored the highest on a retrospective self-assessment in those two domains. They scored the lowest in the domains of Creating a Strong Peer to Peer Culture and Building Community Relations.

Staff and volunteers in all cohorts reported improvements in each of the five CDLI adult practice

areas. The magnitude of the increase appears slightly larger for the earlier cohorts but there were

no statistically significant differences between these improvements in multivariate models.

Organizational capacity was not strongly associated with improvements for staff and volunteers.

Staff and volunteers reported improvements in their practices across all capacity levels. While

there appears to be a pattern of larger growth among Ys with higher organizational capacity when

looking at the visual representation of the changes, these are not statistically significant patterns.

Staff and volunteers in Ys supported by CDLI hub Ys and those supported by technical advisors

(TAs) exhibited similar levels of confidence across the five adult practices. Compared to hub supported Ys, TA-supported Ys had staff whose adult practices were slightly lower at the

beginning of the CDLI, suggesting that they may have improved slightly faster but that the

differences in levels were minimal

https://search.issuelab.org/resource/promoting-character-development-in-youth-programs-through-professional-development-for-staff-and-volunteers-findings-from-an-evaluation-of-the-ymca-of-the-usa-s-character-development-learning-institute.html