Assuming a company has a monopoly, what LEGAL actions would you nonetheless consider to be predatory, abusive, and/or unethical to deem the company to be an illegal monopolizing company? Provide a few examples and explain your rationales from legal, ethical, and economic perspectives. Overall, do you think it is fair and just for a company to be deemed an illegal "monopolizing" company in violation of Section 2 for doing legal "wrongful" acts "merely" because it has a monopoly that it achieved properly? Again, explain your reasoning.