Question
At the close of the defence case, the magistrate, M, convicts A on multiple charges of fraud, and proceeds to the sentencing phase without giving
At the close of the defence case, the magistrate, M, convicts A on multiple charges of fraud, and proceeds to the sentencing phase without giving the reasons for arriving at the verdicts. When called upon by the defence to proffer such reasons, M merely repeats the evidence presented by the prosecution, and insinuates that 'the accused was found guilty on the basis of proven evidence which is already on record' without necessarily advancing his own submissions for the conclusions.
3.3.1 Discuss, M conduct, in light of the Supreme Court of Appeal's judgment in National Director of Public Prosecutions v Naidoo 2011 (1) SACR 336 (SCA), where the court concluded, inter alia, that: "The importance of furnishing reasons for a judgment is a salutary practice... ensuring public confidence in the administration of justice". (12) Hints: your answer must: i. Be sought from p. 388, par. 3 of the Handbook; ii. not include the judgment cited above; and iii. contain a conclusion regarding the correctness or otherwise of M's conduct.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started