ATTENTION: I PAY EVERY MONTH TO BE ABLE TO POST QUESTIONS HERE. THEREFORE, I EXPECT COMPLETE AND QUALITY ANSWERS. DO NOT COPY AND PASTE A SOLUTION THAT IS ALREADY POSTED BY SOMEONE ELSE ON CHEGG. REFRAIN FROM ANSWERING IF YOU CANNOT FULFILL MY DEMAND, AND LEAVE IT FOR SOMEONE WHO CAN ANSWER IT. DON'T WASTE MY QUESTION AS THEY ARE LIMITED.

I posted 2 different posts already and someone keeps copying from the previous post to answer my questions. And the reason I post 2 times is that the first one has no explanations at all. I WILL UP VOTE !! ---- In what type of case does the district attorney's office play a role? A. Torts B. Crimes C. Both of the above. ---- What is/are the possible penalty/penalties when a corporation is found guilty of a crime? A. Fines. B. Jail. C. Termination of the corporation D. Two of the above. E. All of the above. (For this one I personally pick fines, but if you pick other answers please be specific of why ?) ---- True or false: Lawyers have a duty to refrain from starting a frivolous lawsuit. A. True, and if they start such a lawsuit they will face criminal penalties. B. True, and if they start such a lawsuit they will face financial sanctions (fines). C. False, lawyers have a duty to zealously represent their clients. D. False, lawsuits of all types are favored by the law. ----- Grace died in a car accident. Her doctor reported that immediately prior to the accident she suffered a stroke causing her to lose control of the car which in turn caused the accident. Assume that Grace's family was able to prove that the manufacturer of the car sold it with knowledge of a defect in its design. Assume also the car was working properly at the time of the accident despite the defect. If Grace's family sued the manufacturer in tort for her death, which of the following would most likely defeat the family's action? A. Inability to show breach of duty by the manufacturer. B. Inability to show injury to Grace C. Inability to show proximate cause. D. None of the above; the lawsuit should be successful. ---- A doctor who worked at a hospital misread a patient's chart and in error gave him a double dosage of his medication. This caused a significant deterioration of the patient's condition. On what grounds might the patient sue the doctor? A. The tort of assault. B. Defamation. C. Malpractice. D. Interference with contractual relations. ---- In the prior question, on what basis might the patient sue the hospital? A. Repondeat superior. B. Dram Shop Act. C. Attractive nuisance D. Comparative negligence.