Ayrah contracts with a flute teacher to provide flute lessons to her daughter. The lessons are not given despite the teacher receiving payments. Can Ayrah's daughter sue the flute teacher? Which one of the following is correct?

Group of answer choices

The daughter as the recipient of services can sue under contract law for the lessons to be provided.

The contract is between the teacher and the daughter, while the consideration came from the Mother, the daughter can therefore sue.

The daughter has no privity of contract and cannot sue the flute teacher.

The doctrine of privity has been abolished by statute so that the daughter can sue.