b. Evaluate the hypothesis that there is a significant positive correlation between correctly identifying old words and falsely identifying related "lure\" words. Use an alpha level of .05. i. State the null and alternative hypotheses, using specific statistical language. (1 point) ii. Report the results, using APA style. (Confidence intervals and effect size estimates are not required as part of your APA-style reports for this assignment). (2 points) iii. Based on your answer to part b-ii, state whether you should reject or retain Ho and provide a conclusion. (1 point) 3. In the False Memory CogLab, you saw a list of words (e.g., "bed," "drowsy," "tired," "dream") in a study phase. During the subsequent test phase you were shown words and were asked to indicate whether the words were old (shown in the study phase) or new (not shown in the study phase). The test phase lists contained three types of words. Some were old words that were shown in the study phase (e.g., "bed"); others were new words that were unrelated to words that were shown in the study phase (e.g., "cup"); and others were lure words that were related to words shown in the study phase but that were not presented (e.g., "sleep"). Answer the following questions. [11 points] 3. Evaluate the hypothesis that there is a significant correlation between falsely recognizing unrelated new words and falsely recognizing related \"lure\" words. Use an alpha level of .05. i. State the null and alternative hypotheses, using general scientific language. (1 point) iv. State the null and alternative hypotheses, using specific statistical language. (1 point) Report the results, using APA style. (Confidence intervals and effect size estimates are not required as part of your APA-style reports for this assignment). (2 points) Based on your answer to part a-iii, state your decision with respect to Ho and provide a conclusion. (1 point) Imagine that you had started with a directional hypothesis specifically predicting a significant negative correlation between falsely recognizing unrelated new words and falsely recognizing related \"lure\" words. Assume that the alpha level is still .05. What would your p-value have been in this case, and what conclusion would you have drawn? What does your result, compared to your result in part iii, demonstrate about a researcher's power to detect an effect (assuming that the prediction is in the right direction) when using directional versus non-directional hypothesis? (2 pts)