b) Provide an argument for why Tony should be able to challenge the resolution to remove him as a director on the basis of section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth.).

c) Provide an argument for why Tony should be able to challenge the resolution to forfeit his shares on grounds that it was an inequitable use of majority voting power (or fraud on a minority). (5 marks)

(d) Explain how Tony could challenge all the resolutions on the basis of improper notice of the meeting. (5 marks)