Background: Remington's Steak House is a retail theme restaurant located in a large midwestern city. Its main competitors are Outback Steak House and Longhorn Steak House. In order to better understand customers' attitudes and evaluations of Remington's Steak House as well as its two competitors, Remington's Steak House launched a marketing research study using the questionnaire attached below. Data collected from this marketing research study is available on Nexus. Irrelevant questions to the assignment have been removed from the dataset for simplification purpose. Assignment: Using the data available on Nexus and the data analysis techniques learned in class (via Jamovi), please help Remington's Steak House answer the following questions: 1. Provide frequencies/percentages of gender, age, and income of customers in the dataset. 2. What are the percentages of survey respondents who go to each steak house (Outback, Longhorn, and Remington's), broken down by gender, age, and income? 3. Which of the following perception variables significantly (p < .05) predict customer satisfaction (x13)? Large Portions (x7); Competent Employees (x8); Food Quality (x9); Speed of Service (x10); Atmosphere (x11); Reasonable Prices (x12) 4. Out of the three steak houses (Outback, Longhorn, and Remington's), which one seems to be doing best in terms of customer satisfaction (x13), likelihood to return (x14), and likelihood to recommend (x15)? 5. Is there a difference between customers who recall seeing advertisements and ones who do not (x18) in terms of customer satisfaction (x13), likelihood to return (x14), and likelihood to recommend (x15)? Proper screenshots of Jamovi output are required to support your answers.

Note: screenshots have been posted down below attached to their questions. Under each question,give detailed insights on what the data is implying.Explain what the numbers mean and how it compares to other variables.

If you do not understand this assignment, don't attempt. This is from quantitative data analysis using jamovi to analyze data. Answer questions in accordance with their respective questions.

QUESTION 1 DATA SCREENSHOTS FROM JAMOVI

Descriptives
	x19	x20	x21
N		200		200		200
Missing		0		0		0
Mean		0.410		3.06		2.90
Median		0.00		3.00		3.00
Standard deviation		0.493		0.949		1.45
Minimum		0		1		1
Maximum		1		5		5

Frequencies

Frequencies of x19
x19	Counts	% of Total	Cumulative %
Males		118		59.0%		59.0%
Females		82		41.0%		100.0%

Frequencies of x20
x20	Counts	% of Total	Cumulative %
18 - 25		19		9.5%		9.5%
26 - 34		18		9.0%		18.5%
35 - 49		104		52.0%		70.5%
50 - 59		50		25.0%		95.5%
60 and Over		9		4.5%		100.0%

Frequencies of x21
x21	Counts	% of Total	Cumulative %
$20,000 -- $35,000		44		22.0%		22.0%
$35,001 -- $50,000		51		25.5%		47.5%
$50,001 -- $75,000		24		12.0%		59.5%
$75,001 -- $100,000		44		22.0%		81.5%
More than $100,000		37		18.5%		100.0%

Frequencies of x20
x20	Counts	% of Total	Cumulative %
18 - 25		19		9.5%		9.5%
26 - 34		18		9.0%		18.5%
35 - 49		104		52.0%		70.5%
50 - 59		50		25.0%		95.5%
60 and Over		9		4.5%		100.0%

Frequencies

Frequencies of x19
x19	Counts	% of Total	Cumulative %
Males		118		59.0%		59.0%
Females		82		41.0%		100.0%

Frequencies of x20
x20	Counts	% of Total	Cumulative %
18 - 25		19		9.5%		9.5%
26 - 34		18		9.0%		18.5%
35 - 49		104		52.0%		70.5%
50 - 59		50		25.0%		95.5%
60 and Over		9		4.5%		100.0%

Frequencies of x21
x21	Counts	% of Total	Cumulative %
$20,000 -- $35,000		44		22.0%		22.0%
$35,001 -- $50,000		51		25.5%		47.5%
$50,001 -- $75,000		24		12.0%		59.5%
$75,001 -- $100,000		44		22.0%		81.5%
More than $100,000		37		18.5%		100.0%

QUESTION TWO DATA SCREENSHOTS FROM JAMOVI

Descriptives
	x_4	x19	x20	x21
N		Outback		86		86		86
		Longhorn		65		65		65
		Remington's		49		49		49
Missing		Outback		0		0		0
		Longhorn		0		0		0
		Remington's		0		0		0
Mean		Outback		0.384		2.85		2.88
		Longhorn		0.615		3.40		3.06
		Remington's		0.184		2.98		2.69
Median		Outback		0.00		3.00		2.00
		Longhorn		1		4		3
		Remington's		0		3		2
Standard deviation		Outback		0.489		0.861		1.62
		Longhorn		0.490		1.04		1.14
		Remington's		0.391		0.854		1.49
Minimum		Outback		0		1		1
		Longhorn		0		1		1
		Remington's		0		1		1
Maximum		Outback		1		5		5
		Longhorn		1		5		5
		Remington's		1		4		5

Frequencies of x19
x19	x_4	Counts	% of Total	Cumulative %
Males		Outback		53		26.5%		26.5%
		Longhorn		25		12.5%		39.0%
		Remington's		40		20.0%		59.0%
Females		Outback		33		16.5%		75.5%
		Longhorn		40		20.0%		95.5%
		Remington's		9		4.5%		100.0%

Frequencies of x20
x20	x_4	Counts	% of Total	Cumulative %
18 - 25		Outback		6		3.0%		3.0%
		Longhorn		7		3.5%		6.5%
		Remington's		6		3.0%		9.5%
26 - 34		Outback		17		8.5%		18.0%
		Longhorn		1		0.5%		18.5%
		Remington's		0		0.0%		18.5%
35 - 49		Outback		51		25.5%		44.0%
		Longhorn		21		10.5%		54.5%
		Remington's		32		16.0%		70.5%
50 - 59		Outback		8		4.0%		74.5%
		Longhorn		31		15.5%		90.0%
		Remington's		11		5.5%		95.5%
60 and Over		Outback		4		2.0%		97.5%
		Longhorn		5		2.5%		100.0%
		Remington's		0		0.0%		100.0%

Frequencies of x21
x21	x_4	Counts	% of Total	Cumulative %
$20,000 -- $35,000		Outback		26		13.0%		13.0%
		Longhorn		7		3.5%		16.5%
		Remington's		11		5.5%		22.0%
$35,001 -- $50,000		Outback		18		9.0%		31.0%
		Longhorn		13		6.5%		37.5%
		Remington's		20		10.0%		47.5%
$50,001 -- $75,000		Outback		3		1.5%		49.0%
		Longhorn		20		10.0%		59.0%
		Remington's		1		0.5%		59.5%
$75,001 -- $100,000		Outback		18		9.0%		68.5%
		Longhorn		19		9.5%		78.0%
		Remington's		7		3.5%		81.5%
More than $100,000		Outback		21		10.5%		92.0%
		Longhorn		6		3.0%		95.0%
		Remington's		10		5.0%		100.0%

QUESTION 3 DATA SCREENSHOTS FROM JAMOVI

LINEAR REGRESSIONS

Model Fit Measures
Model	R	R
1		0.775		0.601

Model Coefficients - x13
Predictor	Estimate	SE	t	p
Intercept		1.0147		0.4942		2.053		0.041
x7		0.2158		0.1118		1.930		0.055
x8		0.3596		0.0579		6.213		<.001
x9		0.3971		0.0566		7.011		<.001
x10		-0.0958		0.0620		-1.545		0.124
x11		0.1559		0.0384		4.063		<.001
x12		-0.0215		0.1203		-0.179		0.858

QUESTION 4 DATA SCREENSHOTS FROM JAMOVI

One-Way ANOVA

One-Way ANOVA (Welch's)
	F	df1	df2	p
x13		50.5		2		119		<.001
x14		32.5		2		125		<.001
x15		12.5		2		125		<.001

Group Descriptives
	x_4	N	Mean	SD	SE
x13		Outback		86		6.28		0.821		0.0885
		Longhorn		65		5.05		0.738		0.0915
		Remington's		49		5.33		0.774		0.1106
x14		Outback		86		5.95		1.039		0.1121
		Longhorn		65		4.77		0.806		0.0999
		Remington's		49		5.06		0.747		0.1068
x15		Outback		86		5.80		0.943		0.1017
		Longhorn		65		5.05		0.909		0.1127
		Remington's		49		5.39		0.702		0.1002

QUESTION 5 DATA SCREENSHOTS FROM JAMOVI

Independent Samples T-Test

Independent Samples T-Test
		Statistic	df	p
x13		Student's t		-12.92		198		<.001
x14		Student's t		-9.46		198		<.001
x15		Student's t		-8.05		198		<.001

Group Descriptives
	Group	N	Mean	Median	SD	SE
x13		Do Not Recall Ads		130		5.17		5.00		0.738		0.0647
	Recall Ads		70		6.53		7.00		0.653		0.0781
x14		Do Not Recall Ads		130		4.92		5.00		0.903		0.0792
	Recall Ads		70		6.14		6.00		0.804		0.0961
x15		Do Not Recall Ads		130		5.12		5.00		0.859		0.0754
	Recall Ads		70		6.09		6.00		0.717		0.0857

THANKYOU !

In the question , the tables did not post as I hoped for. If you can follow the pattern of what is listed above and shift the data that was extended to the right to the previous column , that's how the table should be . For example in question 1, the data under x20 is what is supposed to be under x19. And the other two on the right are for x20 and x21. Shift all the data to the left to match the column heading