Base on Horton and the Kwuggerbug by Dr. Seuss:

1. Is there a valid contract between Horton the Elephant ("Horton") and the Kwuggerbug ("Bug")?2.Assuming the contract between Horton and the Bug meets the required elements, what defenses could Horton raise to enforcement?

3. Assuming there is a valid contract between Horton and the Bug, and assuming the Bug breached his duty to Horton, what monetary and equitable remedies are available and why?

4. Assume the court rules there was not a valid contract between Horton and the Bug. Is there any other way(s) a court could find in Horton's favor? If so, name two theories of recovery and explain what is required for Horton to prevail under each theory.

5. Could the court rule that the UCC applies to this case? Why or why not?