based on the Feminist Judgments project (2009).The debate motion is as follows:

'Judges should not be feminists.They should be impartial arbiters of the law.'

Prepare arguments both for and against this proposition and debate, and follow with questions.

Questions

1.What are the premises of Rackley's argument(s) for feminist judges and judgments?

2.What was the right judgment in R v. A (No 2)? Why?

3.What is the value of the Feminist Judgments project for (a) students, (b) academics, and (c) legal practitioners?

4.Are you a feminist?Why (not)?