Question
based on the Feminist Judgments project (2009).The debate motion is as follows: 'Judges should not be feminists.They should be impartial arbiters of the law.' Prepare
based on the Feminist Judgments project (2009).The debate motion is as follows:
'Judges should not be feminists.They should be impartial arbiters of the law.'
Prepare arguments both for and against this proposition and debate, and follow with questions.
Questions
1.What are the premises of Rackley's argument(s) for feminist judges and judgments?
2.What was the right judgment in R v. A (No 2)? Why?
3.What is the value of the Feminist Judgments project for (a) students, (b) academics, and (c) legal practitioners?
4.Are you a feminist?Why (not)?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Employment Law New Challenges In The Business Environment
Authors: John Jude Moran
5th Edition
536067031, 978-0536067036
